Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669431›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Rikako Tabata, SungGi Chi, Junichiro Yuda, Yosuke Minami

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Norchelerythrine fromInternational journal of oncology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Recent advances of CAR-T cells in acute myeloid leukemia.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rikako TabataDepartment of Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.
SungGi ChiDepartment of Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5725-7187
Junichiro YudaDepartment of Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4908-1636
Yosuke MinamiDepartment of Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPKameda Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several immune checkpoint molecules and immune targets in leukemic cells have been investigated. Recent studies have suggested the potential clinical benefits of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy against acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially targeting CD33, CD123, and CLL-1, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., anti-PD (programmed cell death)-1 and anti-CTLA4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) antibodies) with or without conventional chemotherapy. Early-phase clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T or natural killer (NK) cells for relapsed/refractory AML showed complete remission (CR) or marked reduction of marrow blasts in a few enrolled patients. Bi-/tri-specific antibodies (e.g., bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) and dual-affinity retargeting (DART)) exhibited 11-67% CR rates with 13-78% risk of cytokine-releasing syndrome (CRS). Conventional chemotherapy in combination with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 antibody for relapsed/refractory AML showed 10-36% CR rates with 7-24 month-long median survival. The current advantages of IO therapy in the field of AML are summarized herein. However, although cancer vaccination should be included in the concept of IO therapy, it is not mentioned in this review because of the paucity of relevant evidence.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BispecificClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint ProteinsImmunoconjugatesImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteReceptors, Chimeric AntigenSurvival RateAntibodies, BispecificImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint ProteinsImmunoconjugatesImmunologic FactorsReceptors, Chimeric Antigenacute myeloid leukemia (AML)bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE)chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)dual-affinity retargeting (DART)immune check-point inhibitor (ICI)trispecific killer cell engager (TriKE)

Identifiers

PMID33669431
PMCPMC7920435
OpenAlexW3131786547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.