Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669249›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Physical Therapists' Opinion of E-Health Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain.

Jesús Martínez de la Cal, Manuel Fernández-Sánchez, Guillermo Adolfo Matarán-Peñarrocha, Deirdre A Hurley, Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez, Inmaculada Carmen Lara-Palomo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesús Martínez de la CalDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Almeria University, 04120 Almeria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2319-1116
Manuel Fernández-SánchezDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Almeria University, 04120 Almeria, Spain.
Guillermo Adolfo Matarán-PeñarrochaMalaga Health District, Andalusian Health Service, 29009 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9201-6285
Deirdre A HurleySchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
Adelaida María Castro-SánchezDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Almeria University, 04120 Almeria, Spain.
Inmaculada Carmen Lara-PalomoDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Almeria University, 04120 Almeria, Spain.
University of Almería · ESAndalusian Health Service · ESUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Using new technologies to manage home exercise programmes is an approach that allows more patients to benefit from therapy. The objective of this study is to explore physical therapists' opinions of the efficacy and disadvantages of implementing a web-based telerehabilitation programme for treating chronic low back pain (CLBP). (2) Methods: Nineteen physical therapists from academic and healthcare fields in both the public and private sector participated in the qualitative study. Texts extracted from a transcript of semi-structured, individual, in-depth interviews with each consenting participant were analysed to obtain the participants' prevailing opinions. The interviews lasted approximately 40 min each. The participants' responses were recorded. (3) Results: The results suggest that telerehabilitation can only be successful if patients become actively involved in their own treatment. However, exercise programmes for LBP are not always adapted to patient preferences. New technologies allow physical therapists to provide their patients with the follow-up and remote contact they demand, but long-term adherence to treatment stems from knowledge of the exercises and the correct techniques employed by the patients themselves. (4) Conclusions: Physical therapists treating patients with chronic non-specific low back pain believe that new technologies can provide highly effective means of reaching a greater number of patients and achieving significant savings in healthcare costs, despite the limitations of a telerehabilitation approach in developing an appropriate and effective patient-based physiotherapy programme.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainPhysical TherapistsTelerehabilitationExercise TherapyHumansPhysical Therapy Modalitieshome-based exerciselow back painphysical therapiststelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID33669249
PMCPMC7919815
OpenAlexW3130704536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.