Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669188›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Sensing Technology for Fish Freshness and Safety: A Review.

Leonardo Franceschelli, Annachiara Berardinelli, Sihem Dabbou, Luigi Ragni, Marco Tartagni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Monitoring the Spoilage of Fresh Sterlet (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Determination of Freshness of Mackerel (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leonardo FranceschelliDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering, Guglielmo Marconi-University of Bologna, Via Dell'Università, 50, 47521 Cesena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0093-5431
Annachiara BerardinelliDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, Via Sommarive, 9, Povo, 38123 Trento, Italy.
Sihem DabbouCentre Agriculture Food Environment, University of Trento, Via E. Mach, 1, S. Michele All'Adige, 38010 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3525-1614
Luigi RagniDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, 47521 Cesena, Italy.
Marco TartagniDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering, Guglielmo Marconi-University of Bologna, Via Dell'Università, 50, 47521 Cesena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard analytical methods for fish freshness assessment are based on the measurement of chemical and physical attributes related to fish appearance, color, meat elasticity or texture, odor, and taste. These methods have plenty of disadvantages, such as being destructive, expensive, and time consuming. All these techniques require highly skilled operators. In the last decade, rapid advances in the development of novel techniques for evaluating food quality attributes have led to the development of non-invasive and non-destructive instrumental techniques, such as biosensors, e-sensors, and spectroscopic methods. The available scientific reports demonstrate that all these new techniques provide a great deal of information with only one test, making them suitable for on-line and/or at-line process control. Moreover, these techniques often require little or no sample preparation and allow sample destruction to be avoided.

Indexed as

FishesFood QualityAnimalsSeafoodTasteTechnologyfish freshnessfish spoilagesensors

Identifiers

PMID33669188
PMCPMC7919655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.