Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669087›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2021

Fiber Optic Sensors: A Review for Glucose Measurement.

José Luis Cano Perez, Jaime Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Christian Perezcampos Mayoral, Eduardo L Pérez-Campos, Maria Del Socorro Pina Canseco, Lorenzo Tepech Carrillo, Laura Pérez-Campos Mayoral, Marciano Vargas Treviño, Edmundo López Apreza, Roberto Rojas Laguna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MoSNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Review of Gas Sensors for COSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

José Luis Cano PerezDoctorado in Biociencias, Facultad de Medicina y Cirugia, Universidad Autónoma "Benito Juárez" de Oaxaca. Ex Hacienda de Aguilera S/N, Calz. San Felipe del Agua, Oaxaca de Juárez, C.P. 68120, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9213-553X
Jaime Gutiérrez-GutiérrezEscuela de Sistemas Biologicos e Innovacion Tecnologica, Universidad Autónoma "Benito Juárez" de Oaxaca (ESBIT-UABJO), Av. Universidad S/N, Ex-Hacienda 5 Señores, Oaxaca de Juárez, C.P. 68120, Mexico.
Christian Perezcampos MayoralDoctorado in Biociencias, Facultad de Medicina y Cirugia, Universidad Autónoma "Benito Juárez" de Oaxaca. Ex Hacienda de Aguilera S/N, Calz. San Felipe del Agua, Oaxaca de Juárez, C.P. 68120, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8910-5332
Eduardo L Pérez-CamposFacultad de Medicina y Cirugia, Universidad Autónoma "Benito Juárez" de Oaxaca. Ex Hacienda de Aguilera S/N, Calz. San Felipe del Agua, Oaxaca de Juárez, C.P. 68120, Mexico.
Maria Del Socorro Pina CansecoFacultad de Medicina y Cirugia, Universidad Autónoma "Benito Juárez" de Oaxaca. Ex Hacienda de Aguilera S/N, Calz. San Felipe del Agua, Oaxaca de Juárez, C.P. 68120, Mexico.
Lorenzo Tepech CarrilloEscuela de Sistemas Biologicos e Innovacion Tecnologica, Universidad Autónoma "Benito Juárez" de Oaxaca (ESBIT-UABJO), Av. Universidad S/N, Ex-Hacienda 5 Señores, Oaxaca de Juárez, C.P. 68120, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0684-3098
Laura Pérez-Campos MayoralFacultad de Medicina y Cirugia, Universidad Autónoma "Benito Juárez" de Oaxaca. Ex Hacienda de Aguilera S/N, Calz. San Felipe del Agua, Oaxaca de Juárez, C.P. 68120, Mexico.
Marciano Vargas TreviñoEscuela de Sistemas Biologicos e Innovacion Tecnologica, Universidad Autónoma "Benito Juárez" de Oaxaca (ESBIT-UABJO), Av. Universidad S/N, Ex-Hacienda 5 Señores, Oaxaca de Juárez, C.P. 68120, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2090-9727
Edmundo López AprezaEscuela de Sistemas Biologicos e Innovacion Tecnologica, Universidad Autónoma "Benito Juárez" de Oaxaca (ESBIT-UABJO), Av. Universidad S/N, Ex-Hacienda 5 Señores, Oaxaca de Juárez, C.P. 68120, Mexico.
Roberto Rojas LagunaDivision de Ingenierias, Campus Irapuato-Salamanca, Universidad de Guanajuato, Carretera Salamanca-Valle de Santiago km 3.5 + 1.8, Comunidad de Palo Blanco, Salamanca, Gto., C.P. 36885, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder, being globally one of the most deadly diseases. This disease requires continually monitoring of the body's glucose levels. There are different types of sensors for measuring glucose, most of them invasive to the patient. Fiber optic sensors have been proven to have advantages compared to conventional sensors and they have great potential for various applications, especially in the biomedical area. Compared to other sensors, they are smaller, easy to handle, mostly non-invasive, thus leading to a lower risk of infection, high precision, well correlated and inexpensive. The objective of this review article is to compare different types of fiber optic sensors made with different experimental techniques applied to biomedicine, especially for glucose sensing. Observations are made on the way of elaboration, as well as the advantages and disadvantages that each one could have in real applications.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesFiber Optic TechnologyGlucoseHumansOptical FibersGlucosebiosensorfiber optic sensorglucose monitoringglucose sensor

Identifiers

PMID33669087
PMCPMC7996499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.