Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33669086›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2021

Plant-Growth Endophytic Bacteria Improve Nutrient Use Efficiency and Modulate Foliar N-Metabolites in Sugarcane Seedling.

Matheus Aparecido Pereira Cipriano, Raquel de Paula Freitas-Iório, Maurício Rocha Dimitrov, Sara Adrián López de Andrade, Eiko Eurya Kuramae, Adriana Parada Dias da Silveira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Enhancing soil health withFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The potential of Paraburkholderia species to enhance crop growth.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Matheus Aparecido Pereira CiprianoCentro de Solos e Recursos Agroambientais, Instituto Agronômico, IAC, 13020-902 Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1259-741X
Raquel de Paula Freitas-IórioCentro de Solos e Recursos Agroambientais, Instituto Agronômico, IAC, 13020-902 Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maurício Rocha DimitrovMicrobial Ecology Department, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, NIOO-KNAW, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sara Adrián López de AndradeDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP, 13083-970 Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9895-9820
Eiko Eurya KuramaeMicrobial Ecology Department, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, NIOO-KNAW, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6701-8668
Adriana Parada Dias da SilveiraCentro de Solos e Recursos Agroambientais, Instituto Agronômico, IAC, 13020-902 Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Agronomical Institute of Campinas · BRNetherlands Institute of Ecology · NLUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 456420-2013-4Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior PNPDFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2008/56147-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beneficial plant-microbe interactions lead to physiological and biochemical changes that may result in plant-growth promotion. This study evaluated the effect of the interaction between sugarcane and endophytic bacterial strains on plant physiological and biochemical responses under two levels of nitrogen (N) fertilization. Six strains of endophytic bacteria, previously selected as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), were used to inoculate sugarcane mini stalks, with and without N fertilization. After 45 days, biomass production; shoot nutrient concentrations; foliar polyamine and free amino acid profiles; activities of nitrate reductase and glutamine synthase; and the relative transcript levels of the

Indexed as

amino acidsendophytesenzymatic activitynitrogenplant-growth promoting bacteriaplant nutritionSaccharum sp.

Identifiers

PMID33669086
PMCPMC7996552
OpenAlexW3133300068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.