Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33668234›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Review of Wearable Sensor-Based Health Monitoring Glove Devices for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Jeffrey Henderson, Joan Condell, James Connolly, Daniel Kelly, Kevin Curran

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. State-of-the-Art Sensors Research in Ireland.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A broad look into the future of rheumatoid arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey HendersonSchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent System, Ulster University Magee Campus, Northland Rd, Londonderry BT48 7JL, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7466-8263
Joan CondellSchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent System, Ulster University Magee Campus, Northland Rd, Londonderry BT48 7JL, Ireland.
James ConnollySchool of Science, Letterkenny Institute of Technology, Port Rd, Gortlee, F92 FC93, Letterkenny, Co. Donegal, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7970-1699
Daniel KellySchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent System, Ulster University Magee Campus, Northland Rd, Londonderry BT48 7JL, Ireland.
Kevin CurranSchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent System, Ulster University Magee Campus, Northland Rd, Londonderry BT48 7JL, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5237-5355
University of Ulster · GBLetterkenny Institute of Technology · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and other neurological conditions is vital for effective treatment. Existing methods of detecting RA rely on observation, questionnaires, and physical measurement, each with their own weaknesses. Pharmaceutical medications and procedures aim to reduce the debilitating effect, preventing the progression of the illness and bringing the condition into remission. There is still a great deal of ambiguity around patient diagnosis, as the difficulty of measurement has reduced the importance that joint stiffness plays as an RA identifier. The research areas of medical rehabilitation and clinical assessment indicate high impact applications for wearable sensing devices. As a result, the overall aim of this research is to review current sensor technologies that could be used to measure an individual's RA severity. Other research teams within RA have previously developed objective measuring devices to assess the physical symptoms of hand steadiness through to joint stiffness. Unfamiliar physical effects of these sensory devices restricted their introduction into clinical practice. This paper provides an updated review among the sensor and glove types proposed in the literature to assist with the diagnosis and rehabilitation activities of RA. Consequently, the main goal of this paper is to review contact systems and to outline their potentialities and limitations. Considerable attention has been paid to gloved based devices as they have been extensively researched for medical practice in recent years. Such technologies are reviewed to determine whether they are suitable measuring tools.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidWearable Electronic DevicesGloves, ProtectiveHandHumansdata glovesjoint measurementrange of motionrehabilitationrheumatoid arthritissmart sensing

Identifiers

PMID33668234
PMCPMC7956752
OpenAlexW3132192568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.