Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33668228›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Nature's Role in Supporting Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Geospatial and Socioecological Study.

Jake M Robinson, Paul Brindley, Ross Cameron, Danielle MacCarthy, Anna Jorgensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Green Social Prescribing in Practice: A Case Study of Walsall, UK.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. COVID-19: Reducing the risk via diet and lifestyle.Journal of integrative medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jake M RobinsonDepartment of Landscape Architecture, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8108-3271
Paul BrindleyDepartment of Landscape Architecture, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9989-9789
Ross CameronDepartment of Landscape Architecture, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Danielle MacCarthySchool of Natural and Built Environment, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5AG, UK.
Anna JorgensenDepartment of Landscape Architecture, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/J500215/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about unprecedented changes to human lifestyles across the world. The virus and associated social restriction measures have been linked to an increase in mental health conditions. A considerable body of evidence shows that spending time in and engaging with nature can improve human health and wellbeing. Our study explores nature's role in supporting health during the COVID-19 pandemic. We created web-based questionnaires with validated health instruments and conducted spatial analyses in a geographic information system (GIS). We collected data (n = 1184) on people's patterns of nature exposure, associated health and wellbeing responses, and potential socioecological drivers such as relative deprivation, access to greenspaces, and land-cover greenness. The majority of responses came from England, UK (n = 993). We applied a range of statistical analyses including bootstrap-resampled correlations and binomial regression models, adjusting for several potential confounding factors. We found that respondents significantly changed their patterns of visiting nature as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. People spent more time in nature and visited nature more often during the pandemic. People generally visited nature for a health and wellbeing benefit and felt that nature helped them cope during the pandemic. Greater land-cover greenness within a 250 m radius around a respondent's postcode was important in predicting higher levels of mental wellbeing. There were significantly more food-growing allotments within 100 and 250 m around respondents with high mental wellbeing scores. The need for a mutually-advantageous relationship between humans and the wider biotic community has never been more important. We must conserve, restore and design nature-centric environments to maintain resilient societies and promote planetary health.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthNaturePandemicsEnglandGeographic Information SystemsHumansSpatial AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairescoronavirusCOVID-19green spacenature-based interventionsnature connectednessplanetary healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID33668228
PMCPMC7967714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.