Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33667250›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Metal artifact reduction and tumor detection using photon-counting multi-energy computed tomography.

Chang-Lae Lee, Junyoung Park, Sangnam Nam, Jiyoung Choi, Yuna Choi, Sangmin Lee, Kyoung-Yong Lee, Minkook Cho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Clinical applications of portable CT scanners.The British journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Imaging in translational cancer research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chang-Lae LeeCT R&D Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2030-4381
Junyoung ParkCT R&D Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sangnam NamCT R&D Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Jiyoung ChoiCT R&D Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Yuna ChoiCT R&D Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sangmin LeeCT R&D Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung-Yong LeeCT R&D Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Minkook ChoCT R&D Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Samsung (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal artifacts are considered a major challenge in computed tomography (CT) as these adversely affect the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Several approaches have been developed to address this problem. The present study explored the clinical potential of a novel photon-counting detector (PCD) CT system in reducing metal artifacts in head CT scans. In particular, we studied the recovery of an oral tumor region located under metal artifacts after correction. Three energy thresholds were used to group data into three bins (bin 1: low-energy, bin 2: middle-energy, and bin 3: high-energy) in the prototype PCD CT system. Three types of physical phantoms were scanned on the prototype PCD CT system. First, we assessed the accuracy of iodine quantification using iodine phantoms at varying concentrations. Second, we evaluated the performance of material decomposition (MD) and virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) using a multi-energy CT phantom. Third, we designed an ATOM phantom with metal insertions to verify the effect of the proposed metal artifact reduction. In particular, we placed an insertion-mimicking an iodine-enhanced oral tumor in the beam path of metallic objects. Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) was performed for each energy bin image, followed by an image-based MD and VMI reconstruction. Image quality was analyzed quantitatively by contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. The results of iodine quantification showed a good match between the true and measured iodine concentrations. Furthermore, as expected, the contrast between iodine and the surrounding material was higher in bin 1 image than in bin 3 image. On the other hand, the bin 3 image of the ATOM phantom showed fewer metal artifacts than the bin 1 image because of the higher photon energy. The result of quantitative assessment demonstrated that the 40-keV VMI (CNR: 20.6 ± 1.2) with NMAR and MD remarkably increased the contrast of the iodine-enhanced region compared with that of the conventional images (CNR: 10.4 ± 0.5) having 30 to 140 keV energy levels. The PCD-based multi-energy CT imaging has immense potential to maximize the contrast of the target tissue and reduce metal artifacts simultaneously. We believe that it would open the door to novel applications for the diagnosis and treatment of several diseases.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAlgorithmsContrast MediaHeadHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMetalsNeoplasmsPhantoms, ImagingPhotonsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaMetals

Identifiers

PMID33667250
PMCPMC7935306
OpenAlexW3133579939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.