Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33667234›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Oncofertility care for newly diagnosed girls with cancer in a national pediatric oncology setting, the first full year experience from the Princess Máxima Center, the PEARL study.

M E Madeleine van der Perk, Anne-Lotte L F van der Kooi, Marianne D van de Wetering, Irene M IJgosse, Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, Simone L Broer, Aart J Klijn, A Birgitta Versluys, Brigitte Arends, Ralph J A Oude Ophuis and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Fertility preservation by ovarian tissue transportation and centralized cryobanking for a 20-year-old woman with Hodgkin lymphoma.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Oncofertility in pediatric patients: current perspectives.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M E Madeleine van der PerkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0782-5307
Anne-Lotte L F van der KooiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Marianne D van de WeteringPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Irene M IJgossePrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Eline van Dulmen-den BroederPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Simone L BroerReproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Aart J KlijnPediatric Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht-Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands.
A Birgitta VersluysPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Brigitte ArendsReproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ralph J A Oude OphuisReproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Hanneke M van SantenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Alida F W van der SteegPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Margreet A VeeningPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Marry M van den Heuvel-EibrinkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Annelies M E BosReproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Princess Máxima Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood cancer patients often remain uninformed regarding their potential risk of gonadal damage. In our hospital we introduced a five step standard oncofertility care plan for all newly diagnosed female patients aiming to identify, inform and triage 100% of patients and counsel 100% of patients at high risk (HR) of gonadal damage. This observational retrospective study (PEARL study) evaluated the use of this standard oncofertility care plan in the first full year in a national cohort.

methodsThe steps consist of 1)timely (preferably before start of gonadotoxic treatment) identification of all new patients, 2)triage of gonadal damage risk using a standardized gonadal damage risk stratification tool, 3)informing all patients and families, 4)counseling of a selected subset of girls, and 5) fertility preservation including ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) in HR patients using amended Edinburgh criteria. A survey of the medical records of all girls newly diagnosed with cancer the first year (1-1-2019 until 31-12-2019) was conducted.

resultsOf 261 girls, 228 (87.4%) were timely identified and triaged. Triage resulted in 151 (66%) low(LR), 32 (14%) intermediate(IR) and 45 (20%) high risk(HR) patients. Ninety-nine families were documented to be timely informed regarding gonadal damage risk. In total, 35 girls (5 LR, 5 IR, 25 HR) were counseled by an oncofertility expert. 16/25 HR patients underwent fertility preservation (1 ovariopexy + OTC, oocyte cryopreservation (1 with and 1 without OTC) and 13 OTC). Fertility preservation did not lead to complications or delay of cancer treatment in any patient.

conclusionWe timely identified and triaged most girls (88%) with cancer with a high risk of gonadal damage to be counseled for fertility preservation. We aim to optimize the oncofertility care plan and the standardized gonadal damage risk stratification tool based on this experience and these may be of value to other pediatric oncology centers.

Indexed as

OvaryAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCounselingCryopreservationDecision MakingFemaleFertility PreservationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNeoplasmsNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesTriage

Identifiers

PMID33667234
PMCPMC7935241
OpenAlexW3134417793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.