ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
Integrating across neuroimaging modalities boosts prediction accuracy of cognitive ability.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Relating Cognition to both Brain Structure and Function: A Systematic Review of Methods.Brain connectivity · 2023Pooled it
- Multimodal MRI prediction of cognitive functioning across the lifespan: separating between-person differences from within-person changes.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Exploring the link between body physiology and cognition: the role of the brain and aging.npj aging · 2026Article
- Article
- Task and Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modeling of Brain-Behavior Relationships in Developmental Cohorts.Biological psychiatry · 2026Review
- Predicting individual differences of fear and cognitive learning and extinction.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Prediction of cognitive test scores: a comparison of brain structure, health, demographic, and cognitive data across adulthood.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Predicting the degree of trait emotional empathy from cortical features using surface-based morphometry.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The role of age in the relationship between brain structure and cognition: moderator or confound?Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- Plant-derived nutritional components in thyroid disease-related neuropsychiatric disorders: mechanistic insights and advances.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Multimodal neuroimaging data boosts the prediction of multifaceted cognition.Research square · 2025Article
- Article
- When Brain Models Aren't Universal: Benchmarking of Ethnic Bias in MRI-Based Cognitive Prediction Across Modalities.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Structural-functional brain network coupling during cognitive demand reveals intelligence-relevant communication strategies.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Improving predictability, reliability, and generalizability of brain-wide associations for cognitive abilities via multimodal stacking.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Prediction of Verbal Abilities From Brain Connectivity Data Across the Lifespan Using a Machine Learning Approach.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- The Shape of the Brain's Connections Is Predictive of Cognitive Performance: An Explainable Machine Learning Study.Human brain mapping · 2025Review
- From Serendipity to Precision: Integrating AI, Multi-Omics, and Human-Specific Models for Personalized Neuropsychiatric Care.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Weak and unstable prediction of personality from the structural connectome.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Quantifying brain-functional dynamics using deep dynamical systems: Technical considerations.iScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Variation in cognitive ability arises from subtle differences in underlying neural architecture. Understanding and predicting individual variability in cognition from the differences in brain networks requires harnessing the unique variance captured by different neuroimaging modalities. Here we adopted a multi-level machine learning approach that combines diffusion, functional, and structural MRI data from the Human Connectome Project (N = 1050) to provide unitary prediction models of various cognitive abilities: global cognitive function, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, impulsivity, spatial orientation, verbal episodic memory and sustained attention. Out-of-sample predictions of each cognitive score were first generated using a sparsity-constrained principal component regression on individual neuroimaging modalities. These individual predictions were then aggregated and submitted to a LASSO estimator that removed redundant variability across channels. This stacked prediction led to a significant improvement in accuracy, relative to the best single modality predictions (approximately 1% to more than 3% boost in variance explained), across a majority of the cognitive abilities tested. Further analysis found that diffusion and brain surface properties contribute the most to the predictive power. Our findings establish a lower bound to predict individual differences in cognition using multiple neuroimaging measures of brain architecture, both structural and functional, quantify the relative predictive power of the different imaging modalities, and reveal how each modality provides unique and complementary information about individual differences in cognitive function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.