Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33667224›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Integrating across neuroimaging modalities boosts prediction accuracy of cognitive ability.

Javier Rasero, Amy Isabella Sentis, Fang-Cheng Yeh, Timothy Verstynen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Javier RaseroDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1661-2856
Amy Isabella SentisCarnegie Mellon Neuroscience Institute, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3231-4322
Fang-Cheng YehProgram in Neural Computation, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7946-2173
Timothy VerstynenDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4720-0336

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Construction of a high-resolution human tractography atlas and its related toolboxR56MH113634 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YEH, FANG-CHENG · 2018 to 2018
$452k
NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH113634NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in cognitive ability arises from subtle differences in underlying neural architecture. Understanding and predicting individual variability in cognition from the differences in brain networks requires harnessing the unique variance captured by different neuroimaging modalities. Here we adopted a multi-level machine learning approach that combines diffusion, functional, and structural MRI data from the Human Connectome Project (N = 1050) to provide unitary prediction models of various cognitive abilities: global cognitive function, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, impulsivity, spatial orientation, verbal episodic memory and sustained attention. Out-of-sample predictions of each cognitive score were first generated using a sparsity-constrained principal component regression on individual neuroimaging modalities. These individual predictions were then aggregated and submitted to a LASSO estimator that removed redundant variability across channels. This stacked prediction led to a significant improvement in accuracy, relative to the best single modality predictions (approximately 1% to more than 3% boost in variance explained), across a majority of the cognitive abilities tested. Further analysis found that diffusion and brain surface properties contribute the most to the predictive power. Our findings establish a lower bound to predict individual differences in cognition using multiple neuroimaging measures of brain architecture, both structural and functional, quantify the relative predictive power of the different imaging modalities, and reveal how each modality provides unique and complementary information about individual differences in cognitive function.

Indexed as

CognitionConnectomeHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID33667224
PMCPMC7984650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.