Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33667220›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Sex identification in embryos and adults of Darwin's finches.

Mariya P Dobreva, Joshua G Lynton-Jenkins, Jaime A Chaves, Masayoshi Tokita, Camille Bonneaud, Arkhat Abzhanov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mariya P DobrevaDepartment of Life Sciences (Silwood Park), Imperial College London, Ascot, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7152-1044
Joshua G Lynton-JenkinsCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1657-7843
Jaime A ChavesDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Masayoshi TokitaDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Camille BonneaudCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2248-3288
Arkhat AbzhanovDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Harvard University · USUniversity of Exeter · GBImperial College London · GBUniversidad San Francisco de Quito · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Darwin's finches are an iconic example of adaptive radiation and evolution under natural selection. Comparative genetic studies using embryos of Darwin's finches have shed light on the possible evolutionary processes underlying the speciation of this clade. Molecular identification of the sex of embryonic samples is important for such studies, where this information often cannot be inferred otherwise. We tested a fast and simple chicken embryo protocol to extract DNA from Darwin's finch embryos. In addition, we applied minor modifications to two of the previously reported PCR primer sets for CHD1, a gene used for sexing adult passerine birds. The sex of all 29 tested embryos of six species of Darwin's finches was determined successfully by PCR, using both primer sets. Next to embryos, hatchlings and fledglings are also impossible to distinguish visually. This extends to juveniles of sexually dimorphic species which are yet to moult in adult-like plumage and beak colouration. Furthermore, four species of Darwin's finches are monomorphic, males and females looking alike. Therefore, sex assessment in the field can be a source of error, especially with respect to juveniles and mature monomorphic birds outside of the mating season. We caught 567 juveniles and adults belonging to six species of Darwin's finches and only 44% had unambiguous sex-specific morphology. We sexed 363 birds by PCR: individuals sexed based on marginal sex specific morphological traits; and birds which were impossible to classify in the field. PCR revealed that for birds with marginal sex specific traits, sexing in the field produced a 13% error rate. This demonstrates that PCR based sexing can improve field studies on Darwin's finches, especially when individuals with unclear sex-related morphology are involved. The protocols used here provide an easy and reliable way to sex Darwin's finches throughout ontogeny, from embryos to adults.

Indexed as

AnimalsAvian ProteinsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianEvolution, MolecularFemaleFinchesMaleSelection, GeneticSex Determination ProcessesAvian ProteinsDNADNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33667220
PMCPMC7935298
OpenAlexW3134862588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.