ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2021
Use of a Telemedicine Risk Assessment Tool to Predict the Risk of Hospitalization of 496 Outpatients With COVID-19: Retrospective Analysis.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Smart Telemedicine Technology to Enhance Nursing Care Satisfaction and Revolutionize COVID-19 Care: Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Leveraging telemedicine to improve MNCH uptake in Kenya: a community-based hybrid model.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Examining patient safety protocols amidst the rise of digital health and telemedicine: nurses' perspectives.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Review
- Comparing a Data Entry Tool to Provider Insights Alone for Assessment of COVID-19 Hospitalization Risk: Pilot Matched Cohort Comparison Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Protection Motivation Perspective Regarding the Use of COVID-19 Mobile Tracing Apps Among Public Users: Empirical Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Coronavirus disease and home recovery: a Singapore perspective.Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR · 2023Review
- Undertaking rapid evaluations during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from evaluating COVID-19 remote home monitoring services in England.Frontiers in sociology · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation of a Triage Checklist for Mild COVID-19 Outpatients in Predicting Subsequent Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization during the Isolation Period: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of a monitored home isolation program for COVID-19 infection during the second wave of the pandemic.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2022Article
- Efficacy of Telemedicine and At-Home Telemonitoring following Hospital Discharge in Patients with COVID-19.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Wearable sensor derived decompensation index for continuous remote monitoring of COVID-19 diagnosed patients.NPJ digital medicine · 2021Article
- Associations between remote patient monitoring programme responsiveness and clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19.BMJ open quality · 2021Article
- Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Impact on Quality of Life 1-6 Months After Illness and Association With Initial Symptom Severity.Open forum infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Remote home monitoring (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients: a rapid systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2021Article
- Efficacy of Telemedicine and Telemonitoring in At-Home Monitoring of Patients with COVID-19.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Description of symptom course in a telemedicine monitoring clinic for acute symptomatic COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Outcomes of home-isolated coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Bahrain.Journal of family & community medicineArticle
- COVID-19 home monitoring program: Healthcare innovation in developing, maintaining, and impacting the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients.Travel medicine and infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRisk assessment of patients with acute COVID-19 in a telemedicine context is not well described. In settings of large numbers of patients, a risk assessment tool may guide resource allocation not only for patient care but also for maximum health care and public health benefit.
objectiveThe goal of this study was to determine whether a COVID-19 telemedicine risk assessment tool accurately predicts hospitalizations.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of a COVID-19 telemedicine home monitoring program serving health care workers and the community in Atlanta, Georgia, with enrollment from March 24 to May 26, 2020; the final call range was from March 27 to June 19, 2020. All patients were assessed by medical providers using an institutional COVID-19 risk assessment tool designating patients as Tier 1 (low risk for hospitalization), Tier 2 (intermediate risk for hospitalization), or Tier 3 (high risk for hospitalization). Patients were followed with regular telephone calls to an endpoint of improvement or hospitalization. Using survival analysis by Cox regression with days to hospitalization as the metric, we analyzed the performance of the risk tiers and explored individual patient factors associated with risk of hospitalization.
resultsProviders using the risk assessment rubric assigned 496 outpatients to tiers: Tier 1, 237 out of 496 (47.8%); Tier 2, 185 out of 496 (37.3%); and Tier 3, 74 out of 496 (14.9%). Subsequent hospitalizations numbered 3 out of 237 (1.3%) for Tier 1, 15 out of 185 (8.1%) for Tier 2, and 17 out of 74 (23%) for Tier 3. From a Cox regression model with age of 60 years or older, gender, and reported obesity as covariates, the adjusted hazard ratios for hospitalization using Tier 1 as reference were 3.74 (95% CI 1.06-13.27; P=.04) for Tier 2 and 10.87 (95% CI 3.09-38.27; P<.001) for Tier 3.
conclusionsA telemedicine risk assessment tool prospectively applied to an outpatient population with COVID-19 identified populations with low, intermediate, and high risk of hospitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.