Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33667027›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2021

Stimulus value gates multisensory integration.

Naomi L Bean, Barry E Stein, Benjamin A Rowland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The rhythm of sensory input shapes audio-visual temporal processing.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multisensory integration in the mammalian brain: diversity and flexibility in health and disease.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naomi L BeanWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-6100
Barry E SteinWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Benjamin A RowlandWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Funding

Reversing Hemianopia with Cross-Modal TrainingR01EY026916 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROWLAND, BENJAMIN A, STEIN, BARRY E · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Role of sensory experience in developing multisensory integrationR01EY031532 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROWLAND, BENJAMIN A, STEIN, BARRY E · 2020 to 2022
$1.7M
Training Program in Multisensory ProcessesT32NS073553 · NINDS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEIN, BARRY E · 2011 to 2020
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026916NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031532NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS073553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain enhances its perceptual and behavioral decisions by integrating information from its multiple senses in what are believed to be optimal ways. This phenomenon of "multisensory integration" appears to be pre-conscious, effortless, and highly efficient. The present experiments examined whether experience could modify this seemingly automatic process. Cats were trained in a localization task in which congruent pairs of auditory-visual stimuli are normally integrated to enhance detection and orientation/approach performance. Consistent with the results of previous studies, animals more reliably detected and approached cross-modal pairs than their modality-specific component stimuli, regardless of whether the pairings were novel or familiar. However, when provided evidence that one of the modality-specific component stimuli had no value (it was not rewarded) animals ceased integrating it with other cues, and it lost its previous ability to enhance approach behaviors. Cross-modal pairings involving that stimulus failed to elicit enhanced responses even when the paired stimuli were congruent and mutually informative. However, the stimulus regained its ability to enhance responses when it was associated with reward. This suggests that experience can selectively block access of stimuli (i.e., filter inputs) to the multisensory computation. Because this filtering process results in the loss of useful information, its operation and behavioral consequences are not optimal. Nevertheless, the process can be of substantial value in natural environments, rich in dynamic stimuli, by using experience to minimize the impact of stimuli unlikely to be of biological significance, and reducing the complexity of the problem of matching signals across the senses.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAnimalsCatsCuesPhotic Stimulationbehaviorcatenhancementorientationplasticity

Identifiers

PMID33667027
PMCPMC8177070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.