ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021
Clinical feasibility and oncologic safety of primary endoscopic submucosal dissection for clinical submucosal invasive early gastric cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discrepancies between preoperative assessment and final pathological criteria in early gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection in Helicobacter pylori-negative early gastric adenocarcinoma with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a two-case report and literature review.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility and oncologic safety of primary endoscopic submucosal dissection for cT1bN0M0 gastric cancer by identifying patients who had undergone curative resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection and patients who had undergone primary surgery but could be treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection.
methodsA single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with cT1bN0M0 gastric cancer (size: ≤ 30 mm) and differentiated histology from January 2007 to May 2017. Submucosal invasion was evaluated using conventional endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography. Patients were divided into the primary endoscopic submucosal dissection and primary surgery groups according to initial treatment.
resultsCurative resection rate was 65.0% (91/140) in the primary endoscopic submucosal dissection group. Of patients in the primary surgery group, 49.1% (82/167) were considered eligible for endoscopic submucosal dissection. No differences in en bloc resection rate were observed between pT1a and pT1b gastric cancers after endoscopic submucosal dissection (97.8 vs. 97.9%). However, the negative horizontal margin rate was higher in pT1a gastric cancer than pT1b gastric cancer (98.9 vs. 91.3%). There was no difference in overall survival among the curative treatment groups (log rank P = 0.310).
conclusionIn this study, 173 (56.4%) out of 307 patients with cT1bN0M0 gastric cancer could avoid unnecessary surgery if primary endoscopic submucosal dissection was used. Based on these findings, it is necessary to add an appropriate indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with cT1b gastric cancer. Further management could be determined based on pathologic findings after primary endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.