ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2021
COVID-19 and the Emerging Regulatory Guidance for Ongoing Clinical Trials in the European Union.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- SWOT analysis of decentralised clinical trials from an ethical, legal, regulatory and operational perspective.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Adapting research ethics for global health crises: a systematic analysis of COVID-19 pandemic research guidelines and reflections on their post-pandemic implications.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Regulatory Interactions and Learnings-RADIAL the Trials@Home Proof-of-Concept Trial on Decentralization.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- The Supply of Investigational Medicinal Product and Management of Study Materials for Decentralized Participants-Insights from the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof-of-Concept Trial.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Evolution of informed consent in research: From the Hippocratic Oath to the tailored consent.Open research Europe · 2024Article
- A single experience in the conduction of clinical trial during COronaVIrusDisease-2019 pandemic.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Article
- Implementing an outpatient clinical trial on COVID-19 treatment in an emergency epidemic context: a mixed methods study among operational and research stakeholders within the Coverage trial, Bordeaux (France).Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022Article
- Article
- Opportunities and Challenges for Decentralized Clinical Trials: European Regulators' Perspective.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Article
- When innovation outpaces regulations: The legal challenges for direct-to-patient supply of investigational medicinal products.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
- Regulatory Flexibilities and Guidances for Addressing the Challenges of COVID-19 in the EU: What Can We Learn from Company Experiences?Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022Article
- Rethinking informed consent in the time of COVID-19: An exploratory survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Use of Real-World Data and Evidence in Drug Development of Medicinal Products Centrally Authorized in Europe in 2018-2019.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the accompanying control measures have significantly affected clinical trial (CT) conduct, and sponsors have needed to make rapid changes to their CT operations. As a result, regulatory guidance was pivotal during the initial phases of the pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate the regulatory readiness and guidance related to COVID-19 in the European Union (EU). The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and national competent authorities' (NCAs') websites were searched in September and October 2020 for guidances on the management of CTs during the pandemic published from January 2020 onward. "Regulatory readiness" was defined as the number of days from the first European COVID-19 case (January 24, 2020) to the first published guidance by the respective NCA. "Regulatory guidance" was evaluated by coding the guidances for the following predefined operational trial activities important for ongoing CTs: obtaining informed consent, participant information, clinic visits, home health visits, telemedicine visits, self-monitoring, investigational medicinal product (IMP) supply, IMP adherence monitoring, CT monitoring, documentation management, regulatory management, and safety management. Twenty-four of the 27 EU NCAs published country-specific guidance. The time from the first European COVID-19 case to the first published EMA guidance was 56 days and ranged from 47 to 66 days for the first national guidances. Guidance was provided most frequently for regulatory management (24/24), safety management (23/24), documentation management (22/24), and CT monitoring (22/24). The regulatory guidance provided during the pandemic, ensuring participant safety and data integrity, may now be the starting point to innovate future CT conduct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.