Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33666178›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

General principles of image optimization in EUS.

Malay Sharma, Stephan Hollerbach, Pietro Fusaroli, Axel Löwe, Jonas Koch, André Ignee, Christian Jenssen, Christoph F Dietrich

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of a Standardized Sedation Protocol on Portal Vein Velocity Measurements in Hospitalized Dogs Using Triplex-Doppler Ultrasonography.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Malay SharmaAryavart Hospital, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Stephan HollerbachDepartment of Gastroenterology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle, Celle, Germany.
Pietro FusaroliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Bologna/Hospital of Imola, Imola, Italy.
Axel LöweDepartment Allgemeine Innere Medizin, (DAIM) Kliniken Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Hirslanden, Bern, Switzerland.
Jonas KochDepartment Allgemeine Innere Medizin, (DAIM) Kliniken Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Hirslanden, Bern, Switzerland.
André IgneeMedical Department, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
Christian JenssenMedical Department, Krankenhaus Märkisch-Oderland, D-15344 Strausberg and Brandenburg Institute of Clinical Medicine at Medical University Brandenburg, Germany.
Christoph F DietrichDepartment Allgemeine Innere Medizin, (DAIM) Kliniken Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Hirslanden, Bern, Switzerland.
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site · CHAllgemeines Krankenhaus Celle · DEArya Vaidya Sala · INCaritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim · DEKrankenhaus Märkisch-Oderland · DEUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of modern EUS, multiple imaging functions, transducer settings, and examination modes have become available for clinical settings. While the major determinants of the ultrasound beam are still comprised of the signal wavelength, its frequency range, and its amplitude, other modifications and calculations have gained more interest for advanced users, such as tissue harmonic imaging (THI), spatial and frequency compounding, certain versions of speckle reduction, and various Doppler/duplex settings. The goal of such techniques is a better, perhaps more realistic image, with reduced artifacts (such as speckle), better image contrast, and an improved signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, "add-ons" such as THI, which is based on the phenomenon of nonlinear distortion of acoustic signals as they travel through tissues, provide greater contrast and an enhanced spatial resolution than conventional EUS. Finally, optimization of spectral and color Doppler imaging in EUS requires experience and knowledge about the basic principles of Doppler/duplex phenomena. For these purposes, factors such as adjustment of Doppler controls, Doppler angle, color gain, spectral wall filters, and others require special attention during EUS examinations. Incorporating these advanced techniques in EUS examinations may be time-consuming and cumbersome. Hence, practical guidelines enabling endosonographers to steer safely through the large quantity of technological properties and settings (knobology) are appreciated. This review provides an overview of the role of important imaging features to be adjusted before, during, and after EUS procedures.

Indexed as

B-modedopplerEUSguidelineimage quality

Identifiers

PMID33666178
PMCPMC8248305
OpenAlexW3134720405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.