Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33666114›Full record

ArticleJournal of attention disorders2022

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and Prescribing Trends of Drugs for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Primary Care England, 2010-2019.

Syed Shahzad Hasan, Nimrata Bal, Isabelle Baker, Chia Siang Kow, Muhammad Umair Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of attention disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neurophysiological Effects of a Digital Therapeutic for Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Quantitative Electroencephalography Analysis of Theta-Gamma Coupling.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: What Are Pharmacists' Roles and Associated Outcomes?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Syed Shahzad HasanUniversity of Huddersfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4058-2215
Nimrata BalUniversity of Huddersfield, UK.
Isabelle BakerUniversity of Huddersfield, UK.
Chia Siang KowInternational Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Muhammad Umair KhanZiauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-9553-9874

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe investigated the prescription trends and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of ADHD drugs in primary care, England between 2010 and 2019.

methodsThe Prescription Cost Analysis database presenting the primary care prescriptions data and the Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles presenting all suspected ADRs reported for each drug were screened. The data were analyzed using linear regression analysis to examine the annual average change per year.

resultsThe prescription items dispensed for ADHD showed an average 11.07% (95% CI 10.54-11.60,

conclusionThe increasing use of ADHD drugs within primary care in England could be a result of multiple factors such as growing ADHD prevalence.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDatabases, FactualGuanfacineHumansPrimary Health CareGuanfacineadverse drug reactionsattention deficit hyperactivity disordercostEnglandprescriptions

Identifiers

PMID33666114
PMCPMC8785293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.