ArticleCurrent microbiology2021
Industrial Mushroom Residue as Cow Bedding: Analysis of Microbial Diversity and Applications.
Article in Current microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spent Mushroom Substrate Reused as Organic Fertilizer Enhances Lettuce (Microorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explored the differences in the microbial diversity and physicochemical properties of mushroom residue and cow manure to provide a theoretical basis for the use of mushroom residue as cow bedding. High-throughput sequencing was used to analyze the bacterial community composition of mushroom residue and cow manure bedding and determine the physical and chemical properties of these different bedding materials. The results showed that the bacterial communities in the two types of bedding materials could be categorized into 6 classes, 13 orders, 32 families, and 48 genera. The dominant genus in the mushroom residue bedding samples after use by cows was Lactobacillus (36.37%) followed by Corynebacterium (22.15%). The dominant group in the cow manure bedding samples after use was "other" (28.8%), followed by Solibacillus (8.76%). The different bedding materials contained varying number of bacterial species. After use, 499 bacterial species were present in the cow manure bedding, while only 345 bacterial species were present in the mushroom residue bedding. The utilization rate of the mushroom residue bedding by dairy cows was 79%, whereas that of the cow manure bedding was 61%. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the application of mushroom residue bedding for dairy cows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33665724What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.