Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33665718›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Before sentinel bleeding: early prediction of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) with a CT-based scoring system.

Diego Palumbo, Domenico Tamburrino, Stefano Partelli, Simone Gusmini, Giorgia Guazzarotti, Roberta Cao, Stefano Crippa, Massimo Falconi, Francesco De Cobelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stent-graft implantation for late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diego PalumboRadiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. palumbo.diego@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7906-540X
Domenico TamburrinoPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Stefano PartelliSan Raffaele Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Simone GusminiRadiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Giorgia GuazzarottiRadiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Roberta CaoRadiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Stefano CrippaSan Raffaele Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FalconiSan Raffaele Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco De CobelliRadiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITSan Raffaele University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesClinically significant pancreatic fistula (POPF) has been established as a well-known risk factor for late and severe postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) (postpancreatectomy pancreatic fistula-associated hemorrhage [PPFH]). Our aim was to assess whether contrast-enhanced CT scan after PD is an effective tool for early prediction of PPFH.

methodsFrom a prospectively acquired database, all consecutive patients who underwent PD between January 2013 and May 2019 were identified; within this database, all patients who were evaluated, for clinical suspicion of POPF, with at least one contrast-enhanced CT scan examination, were enrolled in this retrospective study. The selected CT findings included perianastomotic fluid collections and air bubbles; pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) was analyzed in terms of dehiscence and defect.

resultsOne hundred seventy-eight out of 953 PD patients (18.7%) suffered from clinically significant POPF; after exclusions, 166 patients were enrolled. Among this subset, 33 patients (19.9%) had at least one PPFH episode. In multivariable analysis, PPFH was associated with postoperative CT evidence of fluid collections (p = 0.046), air bubbles (p = 0.046), and posterior PJ defect (p < 0.001). Based on these findings, a practical 4-point prediction score was developed (AUC: 0.904, Se: 76%, Sp: 93.8%): patients with a score ≥ 3 demonstrated a significantly higher risk of PPFH development (OR = 45.6, 95% CI: 13.0-159.3).

conclusionsPostoperative CT scan permits early stratification of PPFH risk, thus providing an actual aid for patients' management. KEY POINTS: • Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a dramatic, clinically unpredictable occurrence. • After pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), early identification of posterior pancreaticojejunostomy defect, perianastomotic air bubbles, and retroperitoneal fluid collections enables effective PPH risk stratification by means of a practical CT-based 4-point scoring system. • CT scan after PD allows a paradigm shift in the management PPH, from a conventional "wait and see" approach, to a more proactive one that relies on early anticipation and timely prevention.

Indexed as

Pancreatic FistulaPancreaticojejunostomyHemorrhageHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedPancreatic fistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative hemorrhageRisk assessmentX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID33665718
OpenAlexW3135507885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.