Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33665703›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2021

An alternate workflow for preparing Precision ID Ancestry and Identity Panel libraries for Illumina sequencing.

Melissa Kr Scheible, Emma K Timpano, Laura M Boggs, Kelly A Meiklejohn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa Kr ScheibleCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Emma K TimpanoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Laura M BoggsCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Kelly A MeiklejohnCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC, USA. kameikle@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-2963
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are well-established for forensic applications. Although they are not compatible with existing criminal databases, they offer some advantages over short tandem repeat (STR) markers including smaller amplicons, no stutter artifacts, and biogeographic ancestry and phenotype predictions. The Precision ID NGS System, a commercial workflow by Thermo Fisher Scientific, offers a streamlined solution for genotyping forensically relevant SNPs using next-generation sequencing. The Precision ID Ancestry and Identity Panels combined target 289 SNPs, and their sensitivity, reproducibility, and accuracy have been evaluated by the forensic community. The aim of this study was to develop an alternative workflow to genotype these SNP panels using Illumina chemistry. Commercial genomic DNAs (gDNAs) (n, 3) were amplified using three uracil-tolerant polymerase master mixes. Resulting amplicons were prepared into libraries using the KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (KAPA Biosystems) and sequenced via Illumina's MiniSeq. Reads were analyzed using a published analysis pipeline to compile final genotypes with read depth information. Phusion U Multiplex PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) statistically outperformed the other master mixes tested (P <0.0001), with respect to the number of SNPs genotyped. To ensure a workflow using Phusion U would be compatible across diverse samples, we optimized PCR cycle number using the same commercial gDNAs (n, 3), reference buccal swabs (n, 3), and environmental (household dust) samples (n, 6). Using the developed workflow, 93.9% of all SNPs were successfully genotyped across sample types. Implementation of the developed workflow should be straightforward for forensic laboratories and suitable for processing reference and casework samples.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryGenotyping TechniquesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideWorkflowFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleSequence Analysis, DNAAncestry SNPsIdentity SNPsNext-generation sequencingPrecision IDSingle nucleotide polymorphisms

Identifiers

PMID33665703
OpenAlexW3134067184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.