Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33665603›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2021

Biofabrication of a shape-stable auricular structure for the reconstruction of ear deformities.

I A Otto, P E Capendale, J P Garcia, M de Ruijter, R F M van Doremalen, M Castilho, T Lawson, M W Grinstaff, C C Breugem, M Kon and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Research progress of three-dimensional bioprinting technology in auricle repair and reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bioprinting of gelatin-based materials for orthopedic application.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Auricular reconstruction via 3D bioprinting strategies: An update.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

I A OttoDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
P E CapendaleDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
J P GarciaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
M de RuijterDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
R F M van DoremalenRobotics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics & Computer Science, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
M CastilhoDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
T LawsonDepartments of Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, USA.
M W GrinstaffDepartments of Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, USA.
C C BreugemDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M KonDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
R LevatoDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
J MaldaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
Heidelberg University · DEUtrecht University · NLBoston University · USDeventer Ziekenhuis · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioengineering of the human auricle remains a significant challenge, where the complex and unique shape, the generation of high-quality neocartilage, and shape preservation are key factors. Future regenerative medicine-based approaches for auricular cartilage reconstruction will benefit from a smart combination of various strategies. Our approach to fabrication of an ear-shaped construct uses hybrid bioprinting techniques, a recently identified progenitor cell population, previously validated biomaterials, and a smart scaffold design. Specifically, we generated a 3D-printed polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold via fused deposition modeling, photocrosslinked a human auricular cartilage progenitor cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl (gelMA) hydrogel within the scaffold, and cultured the bioengineered structure

Indexed as

Auricular cartilageBioprintingCartilage progenitor cellsMechanical reinforcementShape preservation

Identifiers

PMID33665603
PMCPMC7903133
OpenAlexW3125675972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.