Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33665553›Full record

ReviewiScience2021

The neural correlates of ongoing conscious thought.

Jonathan Smallwood, Adam Turnbull, Hao-Ting Wang, Nerissa S P Ho, Giulia L Poerio, Theodoros Karapanagiotidis, Delali Konu, Brontë Mckeown, Meichao Zhang, Charlotte Murphy and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Resolving the Abstract-Concrete Paradox in the Angular Gyrus: A Multimethod Investigation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Real-time fMRI-triggered experience-sampling: a proof-of-concept study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Uncovering the embodied dimension of the wandering mind.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Behavioral, experiential, and physiological signatures of mind blanking.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology / York Imaging Centre, University of York, York, England.
Adam TurnbullDepartment of Psychology / York Imaging Centre, University of York, York, England.
Hao-Ting WangUniversity of Sussex, Brighton, England.
Nerissa S P HoDepartment of Psychology / York Imaging Centre, University of York, York, England.
Giulia L PoerioDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, England.
Theodoros KarapanagiotidisDepartment of Psychology / York Imaging Centre, University of York, York, England.
Delali KonuDepartment of Psychology / York Imaging Centre, University of York, York, England.
Brontë MckeownDepartment of Psychology / York Imaging Centre, University of York, York, England.
Meichao ZhangDepartment of Psychology / York Imaging Centre, University of York, York, England.
Charlotte MurphyDepartment of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
Deniz VatanseverFudan University, Shanghai, China.
Danilo BzdokMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Mahiko KonishiLaboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et de Psycholinguistique, Department d'Etudes Cognitives, ENS, PSL University, EHESS, CNRS, Paris, France.
Robert LeechKings College, London, England.
Paul SeliKings College, London, England.
Jonathan W SchoolerDepartment of Psychology, duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Boris BernhardtMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Daniel S MarguliesCentre Nationale de la Researche Scientifique, Institute du Cerveau et de la Moelle epiniere, Paris, France.
Elizabeth JefferiesDepartment of Psychology / York Imaging Centre, University of York, York, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A core goal in cognitive neuroscience is identifying the physical substrates of the patterns of thought that occupy our daily lives. Contemporary views suggest that the landscape of ongoing experience is heterogeneous and can be influenced by features of both the person and the context. This perspective piece considers recent work that explicitly accounts for both the heterogeneity of the experience and context dependence of patterns of ongoing thought. These studies reveal that systems linked to attention and control are important for organizing experience in response to changing environmental demands. These studies also establish a role of the default mode network beyond task-negative or purely episodic content, for example, implicating it in the level of vivid detail in experience in both task contexts and in spontaneous self-generated experiential states. Together, this work demonstrates that the landscape of ongoing thought is reflected in the activity of multiple neural systems, and it is important to distinguish between processes contributing to how the experience unfolds from those linked to how these experiences are regulated.

Indexed as

Cognitive NeurosciencePsychologyTechniques in Neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID33665553
PMCPMC7907463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.