Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33665450›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

Evaluation of deep convolutional neural networks in classifying human embryo images based on their morphological quality.

Prudhvi Thirumalaraju, Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy, Charles L Bormann, Raghav Gupta, Rohan Pooniwala, Hemanth Kandula, Irene Souter, Irene Dimitriadis, Hadi Shafiee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Prudhvi ThirumalarajuDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Manoj Kumar KanakasabapathyDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Charles L BormannDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Raghav GuptaDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rohan PooniwalaDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hemanth KandulaDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Irene SouterDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Irene DimitriadisDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hadi ShafieeDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Microchip for HBV testing using HIV-infected blood samplesR01AI138800 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHAFIEE, HADI · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Sensitive and quantitative point-of-care viral load testing on paperR01AI118502 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHAFIEE, HADI · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
A mobile health diagnostic device for HIV self-testingR61AI140489 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHAFIEE, HADI · 2019 to 2021
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118502NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI138800NIAID NIH HHS R61 AI140489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical factor that influences the success of an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle is the quality of the transferred embryo. Embryo morphology assessments, conventionally performed through manual microscopic analysis suffer from disparities in practice, selection criteria, and subjectivity due to the experience of the embryologist. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are powerful, promising algorithms with significant potential for accurate classifications across many object categories. Network architectures and hyper-parameters affect the efficiency of CNNs for any given task. Here, we evaluate multi-layered CNNs developed from scratch and popular deep-learning architectures such as Inception v3, ResNET-50, Inception-ResNET-v2, NASNetLarge, ResNeXt-101, ResNeXt-50, and Xception in differentiating between embryos based on their morphological quality at 113 h post insemination (hpi). Xception performed the best in differentiating between the embryos based on their morphological quality.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networksDeep neural networksHuman embryosIn-vitro fertilization

Identifiers

PMID33665450
PMCPMC7907476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.