Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33665374›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2021

Fatigue among children with a chronic disease: a cross-sectional study.

Merel M Nap-van der Vlist, Geertje W Dalmeijer, Martha A Grootenhuis, Kors van der Ent, Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Joost F Swart, Elise M van de Putte, Sanne L Nijhof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Merel M Nap-van der VlistSocial Paediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7911-8516
Geertje W DalmeijerDivision management, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martha A GrootenhuisPsycho-Oncology, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kors van der EntCystic Fibrosis Center and Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marry M van den Heuvel-EibrinkSolid Tumours, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Joost F SwartPaediatric Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elise M van de PutteSocial Paediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sanne L NijhofSocial Paediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine: (1) which biological/lifestyle, psychological and/or social factors are associated with fatigue among children with a chronic disease and (2) how much each of these factors contributes to explaining variance in fatigue. Design and setting: This was a cross-sectional study across two children's hospitals. Patients: We included children aged 8-18 years who visited the outpatient clinic with cystic fibrosis, an autoimmune disease or postcancer treatment. Main outcome measures: Fatigue was assessed using the PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale. Generic biological/lifestyle, psychological and social factors were assessed using clinical assessment tools and questionnaires. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to test the associations between these factors and fatigue. Finally, a multivariable regression model was used to determine which factor(s) have the strongest effect on fatigue. Results: A total of 434 out of 902 children were included (48% participation rate), with a median age of 14.5 years; 42% were male. Among these 434 children, 21.8% were severely fatigued. Together, all biopsychosocial factors explained 74.6% of the variance in fatigue. More fatigue was uniquely associated with poorer physical functioning, more depressive symptoms, more pressure at school, poorer social functioning and older age. Conclusions: Fatigue among children with a chronic disease is multidimensional. Multiple generic biological/lifestyle, psychological and social factors were strongly associated with fatigue, explaining 58.4%; 65.8% and 50.0% of the variance in fatigue, respectively. Altogether, almost three-quarters of the variance in fatigue was explained by this biopsychosocial model. Thus, when assessing and treating fatigue, a transdiagnostic approach is preferred, taking into account biological, psychological and social factors.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseFatigueQuality of LifeAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairescystic fibrosisrheumatology

Identifiers

PMID33665374
PMCPMC7893660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.