ArticleMethodsX2020
Quantitative analysis of cells encapsulated in a scaffold.
Article in MethodsX, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering-A Comparative Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Functionalization of Osteoplastic Material with Human Placental Growth Factor and Assessment of Biocompatibility of the Resulting Material In Vitro.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Graft Polymerization of Acrylamide in an Aqueous Dispersion of Collagen in the Presence of Tributylborane.Polymers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the urgent problems arising while carrying out research in the field of scaffold technology is achieving an objective, direct, quantitative analysis of cells cultivated within a scaffold; one which allows characterization of the density distribution of the cells, their viability and their proliferative activity when encapsulated within the scaffold. This problem is associated with the peculiarities of cell cultivation in the three-dimensional structure of scaffolds, including limitations imposed on the possibility of direct cell counting using light microscopy. Also, most scaffolds are opaque, so this generally excludes methods of quantitative analysis using light microscopy. There are methods for the quantitative analysis of cells in a scaffold based on the assessment of their metabolic activity (for example: MTT test). However, these methods are indirect and can result in significant errors. This is due to differences in the metabolic activity of the cells, for example, in different phases of mitosis. Methods based on direct counting of the number of cells isolated from the scaffold are also characterized by a high degree of error that is associated with the loss of cells during the destruction of the scaffold. We describe in detail a method that allows the direct quantitation of cells within a scaffold. Modifications of the method make it possible both to analyze the proliferative activity of cells cultivated in a scaffold and to assess their viability and density distribution in the three-dimensional structure.•Direct rather than indirect analysis of the number of cells in the scaffold by counting the number of nuclei.•Carrying out research without destroying the scaffold structure.•Carrying out research without additional preliminary preparation of samples before staining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.