Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33665143›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2021

AMR and Covid-19 on the Frontline: A Call to Rethink War, WASH, and Public Health.

Mark Zeitoun, Ghassan Abu Sittah, Reem Shomar, Nassim El Ach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark ZeitounWater Security Research Centre, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1791-0628
Ghassan Abu SittahConflict Medicine Programme, American University of Beirut, LB.ORCID 0000-0001-8150-5294
Reem ShomarIslamic University of Gaza, PS.ORCID 0000-0001-8606-1725
Nassim El AchConflict Medicine Programme, American University of Beirut, LB.ORCID 0000-0002-6841-0976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Viewpoint calls for a greater understanding of the role that water plays in the transmission of anti-microbial resistance and covid-19 in protracted urban armed conflict, in order to develop a 'pathogen-safe' practice. It argues that dealing with the twin threats is difficult enough in the best of circumstances, and is so little understood in war zones that surgeons and water engineers now question if their practice does more harm than good. Experience suggests that the known transmission routes are complicated by a great number of factors, including the entry of heavy metals through bullets in patients' wounds, hospital over-crowding, mutation in treated water or wastewater, and other threats which endure long after the bombing has stopped. The skeleton research agenda proposes greater sewage surveillance, testing of phages and monitoring of treatment designed to dispel or substantiate these assertions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public HealthSanitary EngineeringDisease ReservoirsDisease Transmission, InfectiousDrug Resistance, MicrobialHumansMicrobiological PhenomenaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33665143
PMCPMC7908922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.