ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2021
Regional variation in the use of catheter ablation for patients with arrhythmia in Japan.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and Framework of JROAD-DPC - A Japanese Nationwide Registry Linking Diagnosis Procedure Combination Data With Cardiovascular Quality Metrics.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Regional variation in the use of revascularisation for peripheral artery disease in Japan: a cross-sectional observational study.BMJ open · 2023Observational
- Regional variation in the use of catheter ablation for patients with arrhythmia in Japan.Journal of arrhythmia · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegional variation in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially when performed as an elective procedure, was observed in a previous study. The use of a developing technology, catheter ablation (CA), was compared between regions in Japan. METHODS AND
resultsThe Diagnostic Procedure Combination data, which are publicly available, were used for the analysis. The number of CAs was summarized and the rates for CA and PCI were calculated based on the prefecture's population aged ≥40 years. A linear regression model was constructed to identify the factors associated with regional variation in the use of CA. The number of CAs performed per hospital consistently increased from 2009 to 2018. The mean rate of CA across Japan was 119 per 100 000 population aged ≥40 years in 2018. The highest CA rate was 166 per 100 000 and the lowest CA rate was 29 per 100 000 in 2018, while the highest and lowest PCI rates for angina per 100 000 were 361 and 88 in 2018, respectively. The significant factor associated with regional variation in the CA rate was the number of specialists.
conclusionsA wide regional variation was observed in the use of CA for patients with arrhythmia in Japan. Further research is needed to generate evidence of CA for decision-making as a treatment option and to appropriately deploy this health service regardless of where patients live.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.