Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33664774›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2021

Harm or protection? The adaptive function of tick toxins.

Péter Apari, Gábor Földvári

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tick paralysis induced byFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  2. Molecular Identification ofJournal of parasitology research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Péter ApariInstitute of Evolution Centre for Ecological Research Budapest Hungary.
Gábor FöldváriInstitute of Evolution Centre for Ecological Research Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-9036
HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existence of tick toxins is an old enigma that has intrigued scientists for a long time. The adaptive value of using deadly toxins for predatory animals is obvious: they try to kill the prey in the most effective way or protect themselves from their natural enemies. Ticks, however, are blood-sucking parasites, and it seems paradoxical that they have toxins similar to spiders, scorpions and snakes. Based on published data, here we examine the potential adaptive function of different types of toxins produced by soft and hard ticks. We hypothesize that there are diverse evolutionary roles behind (a) to attack and reduce the tick-transmitted pathogens inside the vertebrate host systemically to protect the tick, (b) to paralyse the host to stop grooming, (c) to speed up host heartbeat to improve blood supply and (d) to inhibit the process of necroptosis to prevent the rejection of hard ticks. We will provide published evidence that supports the above-mentioned hypotheses, and we will give an outlook how these new scientific results might be applied in modern pharmacology and medicine.

Indexed as

adaptive functionantimicrobial effectnecroptosisprotease inhibitorssoft and hard tickstachycardiatick paralysistick toxins

Identifiers

PMID33664774
PMCPMC7896703
OpenAlexW3082733848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.