ReviewFrontiers in immunology2021
Advanced
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the therapeutic potential and chemical properties of trans-chalcone: a comprehensive review.Future medicinal chemistry · 2024Pooled it
- Liver Tissueoid on-a-Chip Modeling Liver Regeneration and Allograft Rejection.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Modeling of kidney allograft rejection using hiPSC-derived kidney organoids and HLA-mismatched PBMCs: an in vitro co-culture system.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- Allogeneic HLA Humoral Immunogenicity and the Prediction of Donor-Specific HLA Antibody Development.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Endothelial cell provenance: an unclear role in transplant medicine.Frontiers in transplantation · 2023Review
- Approaches for Controlling Antibody-Mediated Allograft Rejection Through Targeting B Cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The endothelium plays a key role in acute and chronic rejection of solid organ transplants. During both processes the endothelium is damaged often with major consequences for organ function. Also, endothelial cells (EC) have antigen-presenting properties and can in this manner initiate and enhance alloreactive immune responses. For decades, knowledge about these roles of EC have been obtained by studying both
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.