Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33664735›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2020

Systemic and Mucosal B and T Cell Responses Upon Mucosal Vaccination of Teleost Fish.

Estefanía Muñoz-Atienza, Patricia Díaz-Rosales, Carolina Tafalla

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Current Challenges of Vaccination in Fish Health Management.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Monoclonal antibody generated against Nile tilapia (Fish and shellfish immunology reports · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution.

Estefanía Muñoz-AtienzaFish Immunology and Pathology Laboratory, Animal Health Research Centre (CISA-INIA), Madrid, Spain.
Patricia Díaz-RosalesFish Immunology and Pathology Laboratory, Animal Health Research Centre (CISA-INIA), Madrid, Spain.
Carolina TafallaFish Immunology and Pathology Laboratory, Animal Health Research Centre (CISA-INIA), Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of mucosal vaccines against pathogens is currently a highly explored area of research in both humans and animals. This is due to the fact that mucosal vaccines have the potential to best elicit protective responses at these mucosal surfaces, which represent the frontline of host defense, thus blocking the pathogen at its initial replication sites. However, in order to provide an efficient long-lasting protection, these mucosal vaccines have to be capable of eliciting an adequate systemic immune response in addition to local responses. In aquaculture, the need for mucosal vaccines has further practical implications, as these vaccines would avoid the individual manipulation of fish out of the water, being beneficial from both an economic and animal welfare point of view. However, how B and T cells are organized in teleost fish within these mucosal sites and how they respond to mucosally delivered antigens varies greatly when compared to mammals. For this reason, it is important to establish which mucosally delivered antigens have the capacity to induce strong and long-lasting B and T cell responses. Hence, in this review, we have summarized what is currently known regarding the adaptive immune mechanisms that are induced both locally and systemically in fish after mucosal immunization through different routes of administration including oral and nasal vaccination, anal intubation and immersion vaccination. Finally, based on the data presented, we discuss how mucosal vaccination strategies could be improved to reach significant protection levels in these species.

Indexed as

Immunity, MucosalVaccinationAnimalsB-LymphocytesFish DiseasesFishesT-LymphocytesB cellsimmunoglobulinsmucosal vaccinationsystemic immune responsesT cellsteleost fish

Identifiers

PMID33664735
PMCPMC7921309
OpenAlexW3131845288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.