Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33664568›Full record

Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2021

Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE): A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Emese Csipke, Aisha Shafayat, Kirsty Sprange, Lucy Bradshaw, Alan A Montgomery, Reuben Ogollah, Esme Moniz-Cook, Martin Orrell

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emese CsipkeDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0911-9262
Aisha ShafayatNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0412-381X
Kirsty SprangeNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6443-7242
Lucy BradshawNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Alan A MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Reuben OgollahNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5777-4117
Esme Moniz-CookFaculty of Health Sciences University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7232-4632
Martin OrrellInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1169-3530
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a need for interventions to foster and maintain independence for people with dementia to support community living, improve morale, and reduce stigma. We investigated a social intervention to promote living well and enhance independence for people with mild dementia.

methodsIn this two arm parallel group, feasibility RCT at six sites in England, participants were randomized (1:1) to the PRIDE intervention (encompassing social, physical, and cognitive domains supported by a facilitator over three sessions) compared to usual care only. The main objective was to determine the feasibility of a main trial with respect to measures of recruitment, retention, and adherence to the intervention.

resultsDuring a 7-month period, 402 people were invited to the trial, 148 were screened (37%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=32-42%), 137 were eligible at pre-consent, 94 consented to the trial (69% of those eligible, 95% CI=60-76%), and 92 were randomized (46 to each group). Of those allocated to the intervention, 42 (91%) received at least one of three intervention sessions. Outcome assessment follow-up visits were completed for 73 participants at 6 months (79%, 95% CI=70-87%), and this was similar for both groups.

conclusionA large multi-center trial of the PRIDE intervention in community-dwelling people with mild dementia is feasible using systematic recruitment strategies. The intervention was successfully delivered and well received by participants. Findings from this study will be used to refine the design and processes for a definitive RCT.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN11288961, registered on 23 October 2018.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDementiaEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychosocial Interventiondementiafeasibility trialpsychosocial interventionrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33664568
PMCPMC7921631
OpenAlexW3131529438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.