Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33664079›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Staying ahead of the curve: avigating changes and maintaining gains in patient safety culture - a mixed-methods study.

Maher Abdelraheim Titi, Maram Mohammed Baksh, Beena Zubairi, Rawia Ahmad Mustafa Abdalla, Faisal Abdullah Alsaif, Yasser S Amer, Diana Jamal, Fadi El-Jardali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maher Abdelraheim TitiQuality Management, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia mahertiti1980@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1079-4118
Maram Mohammed BakshQuality Management, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Beena ZubairiQuality Management, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Rawia Ahmad Mustafa AbdallaQuality Management, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal Abdullah AlsaifSurgery, King Saud University College of Medicine, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Yasser S AmerQuality Management, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4097-2317
Diana JamalHealth Management and Policy, American University of Beirut Faculty of Health Sciences, Beirut, Lebanon.
Fadi El-JardaliHealth Management and Policy, American University of Beirut Faculty of Health Sciences, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examines how the results of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture changed between 2012 and 2019 and identifies organisational factors affecting these changes.

designThe study combined the use of quantitative surveys of staff and qualitative interviews with hospital leadership. Secondary data analysis was performed for previous surveys.

settingThis study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching multisite hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

participantsOne thousand hospital staff participated in the survey. Thirty-one executive board members and directors and four focus groups of frontliners were qualitatively interviewed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Twelve safety culture dimensions were assessed to study the patient safety culture as perceived by the healthcare professionals. An additional semi-structured interview was conducted to identify organisational factors, changes, and barriers affecting the patient safety culture. Furthermore, suggestions to improve patient safety were proposed.

resultsComparing the results revealed a general positive trend in scores from 2012 to 2019. The areas of strength included teamwork within and across units, organisational learning, managerial support, overall perception of safety and feedback and communication about error. Non-punitive response to error, staffing and communication and openness consistently remain the lowest-scoring composites. Interview results revealed that organisational changes may have influenced the answers of the participants on some survey composites.

conclusionsPatient safety is a moving target with areas for improvement that are continuously identified. Effective quality improvement initiatives can lead to visible changes in the patient safety culture in a hospital, and consistent leadership commitment and support can maintain these improvements.

Indexed as

Organizational CulturePatient SafetyHospitalsHumansSafety ManagementSaudi ArabiaSurveys and Questionnaireschange managementhealth & safetyhealth services administration & managementorganisational developmentorganisation of health servicesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID33664079
PMCPMC7934776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.