Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33664078›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Patients' and healthcare professionals' beliefs, perceptions and needs towards chronic kidney disease self-management in China: a qualitative study.

Hongxia Shen, Rianne M J J van der Kleij, Paul J M van der Boog, Wenjiao Wang, Xiaoyue Song, Zhengyan Li, Xiaoping Lou, Niels Chavannes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of the efficacy of intervention in the management of AD chronic disease based on the theory of "prevention of the recrudescence of disease".Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Content Validity Assessment of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire in CKD Using Qualitative Methods.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hongxia ShenDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China H.Shen@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0601-4708
Rianne M J J van der KleijDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Paul J M van der BoogDepartment of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wenjiao WangDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaoyue SongDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Zhengyan LiDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaoping LouDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Niels ChavannesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo support the adaptation and translation of an evidence-based chronic kidney disease (CKD) self-management intervention to the Chinese context, we examined the beliefs, perceptions and needs of Chinese patients with CKD and healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards CKD self-management.

designA basic interpretive, cross-sectional qualitative study comprising semistructured interviews and observations.

settingOne major tertiary referral hospital in Henan province, China.

participants11 adults with a diagnosis of CKD with CKD stages G1-G5 and 10 HCPs who worked in the Department of Nephrology.

resultsFour themes emerged: (1) CKD illness perceptions, (2) understanding of and motivation towards CKD self-management, (3) current CKD practice and (4) barriers, (anticipated) facilitators and needs towards CKD self-management. Most patients and HCPs solely mentioned medical management of CKD, and self-management was largely unknown or misinterpreted as adherence to medical treatment. Also, the majority of patients only mentioned performing disease-specific acts of control and not, for instance, behaviour for coping with emotional problems. A paternalistic patient-HCP relationship was often present. Finally, the barriers, facilitators and needs towards CKD self-management were frequently related to knowledge and environmental context and resources.

conclusionsThe limited understanding of CKD self-management, as observed, underlines the need for educational efforts on the use and benefits of self-management before intervention implementation. Also, specific characteristics and needs within the Chinese context need to guide the development or tailoring of CKD self-management interventions. Emphasis should be placed on role management and emotional coping skills, while self-management components should be tailored by addressing the existing paternalistic patient-HCP relationship. The use of electronic health innovations can be an essential facilitator for implementation.

Indexed as

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicSelf-ManagementAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPerceptionQualitative Researchchronic renal failurepublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33664078
PMCPMC7934774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.