Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33664072›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2021

In-Motion-App for remote General Movement Assessment: a multi-site observational study.

Lars Adde, Annemette Brown, Christine van den Broeck, Kris DeCoen, Beate Horsberg Eriksen, Toril Fjørtoft, Daniel Groos, Espen Alexander F Ihlen, Siril Osland, Aurelie Pascal and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03409978 (Feasibility of a Smartphone Application for Computer-based Movement Analysis During the Fidgety Period of General Movements), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03409978 completednot on this map

Feasibility of a Smartphone Application for Computer-based Movement Analysis During the Fidgety Period of General Movements

TypeobservationalSponsorSt. Olavs HospitalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled86ConditionsCerebral PalsyArmsin-Motion app
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lars AddeDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway lars.adde@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5532-0034
Annemette BrownDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Christine van den BroeckDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Kris DeCoenDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium.
Beate Horsberg EriksenDepartment of Pediatrics, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway.
Toril FjørtoftDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Daniel GroosDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Espen Alexander F IhlenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Siril OslandClinic of Clinical Services, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Aurelie PascalDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Henriette PaulsenDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Ole Morten SkogHabilitation Center, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Wiebke SivertsenDepartment of Pediatrics, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway.
Ragnhild StøenDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether videos taken by parents of their infants' spontaneous movements were in accordance with required standards in the In-Motion-App, and whether the videos could be remotely scored by a trained General Movement Assessment (GMA) observer. Additionally, to assess the feasibility of using home-based video recordings for automated tracking of spontaneous movements, and to examine parents' perceptions and experiences of taking videos in their homes.

designThe study was a multi-centre prospective observational study.

settingParents/families of high-risk infants in tertiary care follow-up programmes in Norway, Denmark and Belgium.

methodsParents/families were asked to video record their baby in accordance with the In-Motion standards which were based on published GMA criteria and criteria covering lighting and stability of smartphone. Videos were evaluated as GMA 'scorable' or 'non-scorable' based on predefined criteria. The accuracy of a 7-point body tracker software was compared with manually annotated body key points. Parents were surveyed about the In-Motion-App information and clarity.

participantsThe sample comprised 86 parents/families of high-risk infants.

resultsThe 86 parent/families returned 130 videos, and 121 (96%) of them were in accordance with the requirements for GMA assessment. The 7-point body tracker software detected more than 80% of body key point positions correctly. Most families found the instructions for filming their baby easy to follow, and more than 90% reported that they did not become more worried about their child's development through using the instructions.

conclusionsThis study reveals that a short instructional video enabled parents to video record their infant's spontaneous movements in compliance with the standards required for remote GMA. Further, an accurate automated body point software detecting infant body landmarks in smartphone videos will facilitate clinical and research use soon. Home-based video recordings could be performed without worrying parents about their child's development. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03409978.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsBelgiumChildHumansInfantMovementNorwayParentsSmartphonedevelopmental neurology & neurodisabilitypaediatric intensive & critical carepaediatric neurology

Identifiers

PMID33664072
PMCPMC7934716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.