Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33664068›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Neurotrauma clinicians' perspectives on the contextual challenges associated with long-term follow-up following traumatic brain injury in low-income and middle-income countries: a qualitative study protocol.

Brandon George Smith, Charlotte Jane Whiffin, Ignatius N Esene, Claire Karekezi, Tom Bashford, Muhammad Mukhtar Khan, Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla, Bhagavatula Indira Devi, Peter John Hutchinson, Angelos G Kolias and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Brandon George SmithDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8471-1368
Charlotte Jane WhiffinNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9767-2123
Ignatius N EseneNeurosurgery Division, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bamenda, Bambili, Northwest Region, Cameroon.
Claire KarekeziDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
Tom BashfordNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Muhammad Mukhtar KhanNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Davi Jorge Fontoura SollaNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Bhagavatula Indira DeviNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter John HutchinsonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-1835
Angelos G KoliasDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK ak721@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3992-0587
Anthony FigajiNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Andres M RubianoNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8931-3254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global public health concern; however, low/middle-income countries (LMICs) face the greatest burden. The WHO recognises the significant differences between patient outcomes following injuries in high-income countries versus those in LMICs. Outcome data are not reliably recorded in LMICs and despite improved injury surveillance data, data on disability and long-term functional outcomes remain poorly recorded. Therefore, the full picture of outcome post-TBI in LMICs is largely unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a cross-sectional pragmatic qualitative study using individual semistructured interviews with clinicians who have experience of neurotrauma in LMICs. The aim of this study is to understand the contextual challenges associated with long-term follow-up of patients following TBI in LMICs. For the purpose of the study, we define 'long-term' as any data collected following discharge from hospital. We aim to conduct individual semistructured interviews with 24-48 neurosurgeons, beginning February 2020. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed verbatim. A reflexive thematic analysis will be conducted supported by NVivo software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Cambridge Psychology Research Ethics Committee approved this study in February 2020. Ethical issues within this study include consent, confidentiality and anonymity, and data protection. Participants will provide informed consent and their contributions will be kept confidential. Participants will be free to withdraw at any time without penalty; however, their interview data can only be withdrawn up to 1 week after data collection. Findings generated from the study will be shared with relevant stakeholders such as the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies and disseminated in conference presentations and journal publications.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticDeveloping CountriesCross-Sectional StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncomeneurological injuryneurosurgeryqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33664068
PMCPMC7934765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.