Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33664017›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2021

Ambulatory Function and Mortality among Cancer Survivors in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Elizabeth A Salerno, Pedro F Saint-Maurice, Erik A Willis, Steven C Moore, Loretta DiPietro, Charles E Matthews

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A SalernoDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri. e.salerno@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5152-3168
Pedro F Saint-MauriceMetabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland.
Erik A WillisChildren's Healthy Weight Research Group, Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Steven C MooreMetabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-8169-1661
Loretta DiPietroDepartment of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
Charles E MatthewsMetabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland.
Cancer Genetics (United States) · USMilken Institute · USNorth Carolina Division of Public Health · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited evidence describing associations between cancer and function in diverse cancer types and its relationship with mortality. We investigated the relationship between cancer and poor ambulatory function and associations between ambulatory function and subsequent mortality.

methodsParticipants included 233,135 adults (

resultsSurvivors had 42% greater odds of walking at the slowest pace [OR, 1.42 (confidence interval (CI), 1.30-1.54)] and 24% greater odds of mobility disability [OR, 1.24 (CI, 1.17-1.31)], compared with cancer-free participants, adjusting for baseline demographics, health indicators, and cancer type. Survivors reporting the slowest pace were at increased hazards than those who walked the fastest: all-cause mortality [HR, 2.22 (CI, 2.06-2.39)] and cancer mortality [HR, 2.12 (CI, 1.83-2.45)]. Similar trends emerged for mobility disability (HRs > 1.64). All-cause mortality associations were significant for more than nine cancer types.

conclusionsA diagnosis of cancer is associated with poorer ambulatory function, which is subsequently associated with increased mortality. IMPACT: Widespread efforts should target ambulatory function during cancer survivorship for survival benefits.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsDisability EvaluationMobility LimitationWalking SpeedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33664017
PMCPMC8300589
OpenAlexW3134736082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.