Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33663799›Full record

ArticleHealth policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Emerging electronic cigarette policies in European member states, Canada, and the United States.

L Morgan Snell, Nicole Nicksic, Dimitra Panteli, Sara Burke, Thomas Eissenberg, Giovanni Fattore, Charmaine Gauci, Helena Koprivnikar, Liuba Murauskiene, Marge Reinap and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Nicotine Salt and Free-Base Using an E-cigarette: A Randomized Crossover Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

L Morgan SnellVirginia Commonwealth University, USA.
Nicole NicksicVirginia Commonwealth University, USA.
Dimitra PanteliTechnical University of Berlin, Germany.
Sara BurkeUniversity of Dublin Trinity College, Ireland.
Thomas EissenbergVirginia Commonwealth University, USA.
Giovanni FattoreBocconi University, Italy.
Charmaine GauciDepartment of Health Regulation Malta, Malta.
Helena KoprivnikarNational Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia, Slovenia.
Liuba MurauskieneVilnius University, Lithuania.
Marge ReinapWorld Health Organization, Switzerland.
Andrew J BarnesVirginia Commonwealth University, USA. Electronic address: Abarnes3@vcu.edu.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USBocconi University · ITMinistry for Health · MTNational Institute of Public Health · SITechnische Universität Berlin · DETrinity College Dublin · IEVilnius University · LTWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Project 4: Using a prospective cohort survey to test population-level predictions generated by Projects 1-3U54DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI FAGAN, PEBBLES · 2018 to 2022
$20.8M
NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036105World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased electronic cigarette (ECIG) use has motivated new regulations to address the changing landscape of tobacco use and promote public health.

methodThis policy scan compares ECIG prevalence and regulations in the European Union (EU), Canada, and the United States (US) at the federal- and local-level to foster a policy dialogue around modern tobacco prevention and control regulations.

resultsAmong young adults, 40 % in the US, 29 % in Canada, and 28 % in the EU report ever using an ECIG. Results from the policy scan find significant variation in approach to regulating ECIGs. EU member states are subject to the most stringent requirements regarding nicotine concentration regulations, and several member states have also opted to ban flavors and/or require plain packaging or out of sight retail sales. Among EU and US states, taxation is a popular strategy, though taxing strategies vary widely. Regarding youth use, US states have led the way for increasing the legal age of sale to 21 at the federal level, and in Canada recent federal regulations are innovative in their approach to banning advertising that may appeal to youth.

conclusionStrategies to achieve public health goals related to ECIGs vary widely, with federalism playing an important role in policy innovation, offering opportunities to evaluate their effectiveness and inform future regulations.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingAdolescentCanadaHumansPolicySmokingUnited StatesYoung AdultE-cigaretteElectronic cigaretteElectronic nicotine delivery systemFederalismPolicyRegulationTobacco

Identifiers

PMID33663799
PMCPMC8025686
OpenAlexW3132066006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.