Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33663579›Full record

SynthesisTrials2021

Systematic review of available software for multi-arm multi-stage and platform clinical trial design.

Elias Laurin Meyer, Peter Mesenbrink, Tobias Mielke, Tom Parke, Daniel Evans, Franz König, EU-PEARL (EU Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms) Consortium

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gerontologic Biostatistics and Data Science: Aging Research in the Era of Big Data.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. In Silico Clinical Trials: Is It Possible?Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elias Laurin MeyerCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter MesenbrinkNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Tobias MielkeJanssen Cilag GmbH, Neuss, Germany.
Tom ParkeBerry Consultants, Abingdon, UK.
Daniel EvansPfizer R&D UK Ltd, Sandwich, UK.
Franz KönigCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. franz.koenig@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-3304
EU-PEARL (EU Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms) Consortium

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) 853966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the popularity of multi-arm multi-stage, seamless adaptive, and platform trials has increased. However, many design-related questions and questions regarding which operating characteristics should be evaluated to determine the potential performance of a specific trial design remain and are often further complicated by the complexity of such trial designs.

methodsA systematic search was conducted to review existing software for the design of platform trials, whereby multi-arm multi-stage trials were also included. The results of this search are reported both on the literature level and the software level, highlighting the software judged to be particularly useful.

resultsIn recent years, many highly specialized software packages targeting single design elements on platform studies have been released. Only a few of the developed software packages provide extensive design flexibility, at the cost of limited access due to being commercial or not being usable as out-of-the-box solutions.

conclusionsWe believe that both an open-source modular software similar to OCTOPUS and a collaborative effort will be necessary to create software that takes advantage of and investigates the impact of all the flexibility that platform trials potentially provide.

Indexed as

Research DesignSoftwareAdaptive Clinical Trials as TopicClinical Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID33663579
PMCPMC7931508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.