Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33663498›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2021

Excess mortality for care home residents during the first 23 weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a national cohort study.

Marcello Morciano, Jonathan Stokes, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Ian Hall, Alex J Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Professor Ian Hall's contribution to the Discussion of 'Some statistical aspects of the COVID-19 response' by Wood et al.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcello MorcianoHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. marcello.morciano@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0009-5201
Jonathan StokesHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Evangelos KontopantelisNIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Ian HallDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Alex J TurnerHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T027517/1Medical Research Council MR/V038613/1National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration for Greater ManchesterNational Institute for Health Research PR-PRU-1217-20801National Institute for Health Research PR-R17-0916-21001NIHR School for Primary Care Research SPCR-2014-10043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo estimate excess mortality for care home residents during the COVID-19 pandemic in England, exploring associations with care home characteristics.

methodsDaily number of deaths in all residential and nursing homes in England notified to the Care Quality Commission (CQC) from 1 January 2017 to 7 August 2020. Care home-level data linked with CQC care home register to identify home characteristics: client type (over 65s/children and adults), ownership status (for-profit/not-for-profit; branded/independent) and size (small/medium/large). Excess deaths computed as the difference between observed and predicted deaths using local authority fixed-effect Poisson regressions on pre-pandemic data. Fixed-effect logistic regressions were used to model odds of experiencing COVID-19 suspected/confirmed deaths.

resultsUp to 7 August 2020, there were 29,542 (95% CI 25,176 to 33,908) excess deaths in all care homes. Excess deaths represented 6.5% (95% CI 5.5 to 7.4%) of all care home beds, higher in nursing (8.4%) than residential (4.6%) homes. 64.7% (95% CI 56.4 to 76.0%) of the excess deaths were confirmed/suspected COVID-19. Almost all excess deaths were recorded in the quarter (27.4%) of homes with any COVID-19 fatalities. The odds of experiencing COVID-19 attributable deaths were higher in homes providing nursing services (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.0), to older people and/or with dementia (OR 5.5, 95% CI 4.4 to 6.8), amongst larger (vs. small) homes (OR 13.3, 95% CI 11.5 to 15.4) and belonging to a large provider/brand (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.3). There was no significant association with for-profit status of providers.

conclusionsTo limit excess mortality, policy should be targeted at care homes to minimise the risk of ingress of disease and limit subsequent transmission. Our findings provide specific characteristic targets for further research on mechanisms and policy priority.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Services for the AgedQuality of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHomes for the AgedHumansMaleMortalityNursing HomesResidential FacilitiesSARS-CoV-2Care homesCOVID-19EnglandExcess deaths

Identifiers

PMID33663498
PMCPMC7932761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.