Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33663488›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2021

Cost-effectiveness of district-wide seasonal malaria chemoprevention when implemented through routine malaria control programme in Kita, Mali using fixed point distribution.

Halimatou Diawara, Patrick Walker, Matt Cairns, Laura C Steinhardt, Fatou Diawara, Beh Kamate, Laeticia Duval, Elisa Sicuri, Issaka Sagara, Aboubacar Sadou and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Halimatou DiawaraMalaria Research & Training Centre, Faculty of Pharmacy and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Sciences Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, P.O Box 1805, Bamako, Mali. hdiawara@icermali.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-1532
Patrick WalkerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Matt CairnsLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Laura C SteinhardtMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H24-3, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Fatou DiawaraMalaria Research & Training Centre, Faculty of Pharmacy and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Sciences Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, P.O Box 1805, Bamako, Mali.
Beh KamateMaternal and Child Survival Program, Save the Children, Bamako, Mali.
Laeticia DuvalDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Elisa SicuriDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Issaka SagaraMalaria Research & Training Centre, Faculty of Pharmacy and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Sciences Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, P.O Box 1805, Bamako, Mali.
Aboubacar SadouPresident's Malaria Initiative, US Agency for International Development, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Jules MihigoPresident's Malaria Initiative, US Agency for International Development, Bamako, Mali.
Erin EckertPresident's Malaria Initiative, USAID Bureau for Global Health, Office of Health, Infectious Diseases, and Nutrition, 2100 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA, 22202, USA.
Alassane DickoMalaria Research & Training Centre, Faculty of Pharmacy and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Sciences Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, P.O Box 1805, Bamako, Mali.
Lesong ContehDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako · MLU.S. President's Malaria Initiative · USImperial College London · GBCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USCentre d'Économie de la Sorbonne · FRLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBMali-Folkecenter · MLUniversity of Bamako · MLUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J012394/1Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) is a strategy for malaria control recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) since 2012 for Sahelian countries. The Mali National Malaria Control Programme adopted a plan for pilot implementation and nationwide scale-up by 2016. Given that SMC is a relatively new approach, there is an urgent need to assess the costs and cost effectiveness of SMC when implemented through the routine health system to inform decisions on resource allocation.

methodsCost data were collected from pilot implementation of SMC in Kita district, which targeted 77,497 children aged 3-59 months. Starting in August 2014, SMC was delivered by fixed point distribution in villages with the first dose observed each month. Treatment consisted of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine once a month for four consecutive months, or rounds. Economic and financial costs were collected from the provider perspective using an ingredients approach. Effectiveness estimates were based upon a published mathematical transmission model calibrated to local epidemiology, rainfall patterns and scale-up of interventions. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios were calculated for the cost per malaria episode averted, cost per disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted, and cost per death averted.

resultsThe total economic cost of the intervention in the district of Kita was US $357,494. Drug costs and personnel costs accounted for 34% and 31%, respectively. Incentives (payment other than salary for efforts beyond routine activities) accounted for 25% of total implementation costs. Average financial and economic unit costs per child per round were US $0.73 and US $0.86, respectively; total annual financial and economic costs per child receiving SMC were US $2.92 and US $3.43, respectively. Accounting for coverage, the economic cost per child fully adherent (receiving all four rounds) was US $6.38 and US $4.69, if weighted highly adherent, (receiving 3 or 4 rounds of SMC). When costs were combined with modelled effects, the economic cost per malaria episode averted in children was US $4.26 (uncertainty bound 2.83-7.17), US $144 (135-153) per DALY averted and US $ 14,503 (13,604-15,402) per death averted.

conclusionsWhen implemented at fixed point distribution through the routine health system in Mali, SMC was highly cost-effective. As in previous SMC implementation studies, financial incentives were a large cost component.

Indexed as

AmodiaquineAntimalarialsChemopreventionChild, PreschoolCommunicable Disease ControlCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug CombinationsHumansInfantMalariaMaliPyrimethamineSeasonsSulfadoxineAmodiaquineAntimalarialsDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationPyrimethamineSulfadoxineCostCost-effectivenessDisability-adjusted life year (DALY)EconomicFinancialMalariaMaliSeasonal malaria chemoprevention

Identifiers

PMID33663488
PMCPMC7934250
OpenAlexW3134660780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.