Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33663479›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Neural classification of Norwegian radiology reports: using NLP to detect findings in CT-scans of children.

Fredrik A Dahl, Taraka Rama, Petter Hurlen, Pål H Brekke, Haldor Husby, Tore Gundersen, Øystein Nytrø, Lilja Øvrelid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fredrik A DahlHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway. Fredrik.dahl@ahus.no.ORCID 0000-0002-6835-0985
Taraka RamaDepartment of Linguistics, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.
Petter HurlenDivision of Diagnostics and Technology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Pål H BrekkeDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Haldor HusbyInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Tore GundersenData and Analytics, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Øystein NytrøDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8163-2362
Lilja ØvrelidDepartment of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith a motivation of quality assurance, machine learning techniques were trained to classify Norwegian radiology reports of paediatric CT examinations according to their description of abnormal findings.

methods13.506 reports from CT-scans of children, 1000 reports from CT scan of adults and 1000 reports from X-ray examination of adults were classified as positive or negative by a radiologist, according to the presence of abnormal findings. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated by comparison with a clinician's classifications of 500 reports. Test-retest reliability of the radiologist was performed on the same 500 reports. A convolutional neural network model (CNN), a bidirectional recurrent neural network model (bi-LSTM) and a support vector machine model (SVM) were trained on a random selection of the children's data set. Models were evaluated on the remaining CT-children reports and the adult data sets.

resultsTest-retest reliability: Cohen's Kappa = 0.86 and F1 = 0.919. Inter-rater reliability: Kappa = 0.80 and F1 = 0.885. Model performances on the Children-CT data were as follows. CNN: (AUC = 0.981, F1 = 0.930), bi-LSTM: (AUC = 0.978, F1 = 0.927), SVM: (AUC = 0.975, F1 = 0.912). On the adult data sets, the models had AUC around 0.95 and F1 around 0.91.

conclusionsThe models performed close to perfectly on its defined domain, and also performed convincingly on reports pertaining to a different patient group and a different modality. The models were deemed suitable for classifying radiology reports for future quality assurance purposes, where the fraction of the examinations with abnormal findings for different sub-groups of patients is a parameter of interest.

Indexed as

RadiologyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultChildHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsMachine learningNatural language processingReproducibility of resultsTomographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID33663479
PMCPMC7934405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.