Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33663399›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Prognostic value of the micronucleus assay for clinical endpoints in neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Leif Hendrik Dröge, Steffen Hennies, Stephan Lorenzen, Lena-Christin Conradi, Henriette Quack, Torsten Liersch, Christian Helms, Miriam Alice Frank, Markus Anton Schirmer, Margret Rave-Fränk and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leif Hendrik DrögeDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. hendrik.droege@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Steffen HenniesUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Stephan LorenzenInstitute of Medical Bioinformatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Lena-Christin ConradiDepartment of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Henriette QuackDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Torsten LierschDepartment of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Christian HelmsDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Miriam Alice FrankDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Markus Anton SchirmerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Margret Rave-FränkDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Tim Beißbarth *Institute of Medical Bioinformatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Hendrik Andreas Wolff *University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 33996666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe question whether lymphocyte radiosensitivity is representative of patients' response to radiotherapy (RT) remains unsolved. We analyzed lymphocyte cytogenetic damage in patients who were homogeneously treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) for rectal cancer within clinical trials. We tested for interindividual variation and consistent radiosensitivity after in-vivo and in-vitro irradiation, analyzed the effect of patients' and RCT characteristics on cytogenetic damage, and tested for correlations with patients' outcome in terms of tumor response, survival and treatment-related toxicity.

methodsThe cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome (CBMNcyt) assay was performed on the peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLCs) of 134 patients obtained before, during, at the end of RCT, and during the 2-year follow-up. A subset of PBLCs obtained before RCT was irradiated in-vitro with 3 Gy. RCT included 50.4 Gy of pelvic RT with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone (n = 78) or 5-FU plus oxaliplatin (n = 56). The analyzed variables included patients' age, gender, RT characteristics (planning target volume size [PTV size], RT technique), and chemotherapy characteristics (5-FU plasma levels, addition of oxaliplatin). Outcome was analyzed as tumor regression, patient survival, and acute and late toxicity.

resultsCytogenetic damage increased significantly with the radiation dose and varied substantially between individuals. Women were more sensitive than men; no significant age-dependent differences were observed. There was a significant correlation between the cytogenetic damage after in-vitro irradiation and in-vivo RCT. We found a significant effect of the PTV size on the yields of cytogenetic damage after RCT, while the RT technique had no effect. Neither the addition of oxaliplatin nor the 5-FU levels influenced cytogenetic damage. We found no correlation between patient outcome and the cytogenetic damage.

conclusionsWe found consistent cytogenetic damage in lymphocytes after in-vivo RCT and in-vitro irradiation. Gender was confirmed as a well-known, and the PTV size was identified as a less well-known influencing variable on lymphocyte cytogenetic damage after partial-body irradiation. A consistent level of cytogenetic damage after in-vivo and in-vitro irradiation may indicate the importance of genetic factors for individual radiosensitivity. However, we found no evidence that in-vivo or in-vitro irradiation-induced cytogenetic damage is an adequate biomarker for the response to RCT in rectal cancer patients.

Indexed as

Micronuclei, Chromosome-DefectiveAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansMaleMicronucleus TestsMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisRectal NeoplasmsCytogenetic damageMicronucleus testRadiochemotherapyRectal cancerSurvivalToxicity

Identifiers

PMID33663399
PMCPMC7931609
OpenAlexW3135521229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.