ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021
Deep Neural Network Approach for Continuous ECG-Based Automated External Defibrillator Shock Advisory System During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Cascade Skip-Connection BiLSTM Autoencoder for CPR Artifact Removal Prior to AED Shock Advisory.IEEE open journal of the Computer Society · 2026Article
- Wolf Creek XVIII Part 3: Innovations in Defibrillation Science.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
- Deep learning for suppressing EMG and motion artifacts in armband ECG R-peak detection.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Article
- Rethinking the 2-minute rule in adult basic life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Flexible self-rectifying synapse array for energy-efficient edge multiplication in electrocardiogram diagnosis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Comparison of Neural Network Structures for Identifying Shockable Rhythm During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning innovations in CPR: a comprehensive survey on enhanced resuscitation techniques.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
- Implementing an intelligent diagnosis and treatment system for in-hospital cardiac arrest in the Utstein style: a multi-center case study.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- State of the art of mobile health technologies use in clinical arrhythmia care.Communications medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence to support out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care: A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
- AI and machine learning in resuscitation: Ongoing research, new concepts, and key challenges.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prehospital emergency care: A scoping review.iScience · 2023Article
- Deep cross-modal feature learning applied to predict acutely decompensated heart failure using in-home collected electrocardiography and transthoracic bioimpedance.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Strategy for Sliding ECG Analysis during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Influence of the Hands-Off Time on Accuracy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Current and Future Use of Artificial Intelligence in Electrocardiography.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Real-time amplitude spectrum area estimation during chest compression from the ECG waveform using a 1D convolutional neural network.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods on Electrocardiogram Data: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Because chest compressions induce artifacts in the ECG, current automated external defibrillators instruct the user to stop cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) while an automated rhythm analysis is performed. It has been shown that minimizing interruptions in CPR increases the chance of survival. Methods and Results The objective of this study was to apply a deep-learning algorithm using convolutional layers, residual networks, and bidirectional long short-term memory method to classify shockable versus nonshockable rhythms in the presence and absence of CPR artifact. Forty subjects' data from Physionet with 1131 shockable and 2741 nonshockable samples contaminated with 43 different CPR artifacts that were acquired from a commercial automated external defibrillator during asystole were used. We had separate data as train and test sets. Using our deep neural network model, the sensitivity and specificity of the shock versus no-shock decision for the entire data set over the 4-fold cross-validation sets were 95.21% and 86.03%, respectively. This result was based on the training and testing of the model using ECG data in both the presence and the absence of CPR artifact. For ECG without CPR artifact, the sensitivity was 99.04% and the specificity was 95.2%. A sensitivity of 94.21% and a specificity of 86.14% were obtained for ECG with CPR artifact. In addition to 4-fold cross-validation sets, we also examined leave-one-subject-out validation. The sensitivity and specificity for the case of leave-one-subject-out validation were 92.71% and 97.6%, respectively. Conclusions The proposed trained model can make shock versus nonshock decision in automated external defibrillators, regardless of CPR status. The results meet the American Heart Association's sensitivity requirement (>90%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.