Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33662962›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Cannot Predict Histopathological Features and Response to Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Alexey Surov, Maciej Pech, Maciej Powerski, Katja Woidacki, Andreas Wienke

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prediction of Kirsten rat sarcoma (Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexey SurovClinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Maciej PechClinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Maciej PowerskiClinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Katja WoidackiExperimental Radiology, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Andreas WienkeInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimOur purpose was to perform a systemic literature review and meta-analysis regarding use of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for prediction of histopathological features in rectal cancer (RC) and to prove if ADC can predict treatment response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NARC) in RC.

methodsMEDLINE library, EMBASE, Cochrane, and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between ADC and histopathology and/or treatment response in RC up to June 2020. Authors, year of publication, study design, number of patients, mean value, and standard deviation of ADC were acquired. The methodological quality of the collected studies was checked according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies instrument. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using the RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used to account the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean ADC values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

resultsOverall, 37 items (2,015 patients) were included. ADC values of tumors with different T and N stages and grades overlapped strongly. ADC cannot distinguish RC with a high- and low-carcinoembryonic antigen level. Regarding KRAS status, ADC cannot discriminate mutated and wild-type RC. ADC did not correlate significantly with expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and hypoxia-inducible factor 1a. ADC correlates with Ki 67, with the calculated correlation coefficient: -0.52. The ADC values in responders and nonresponders overlapped significantly.

conclusionADC correlates moderately with expression of Ki 67 in RC. ADC cannot discriminate tumor stages, grades, and KRAS status in RC. ADC cannot predict therapy response to NARC in RC.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAapparent diffusion coefficientDiffusion-weighted imagingMagnetic resonance imagingRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID33662962
PMCPMC8820443
OpenAlexW3133715703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.