Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33662958›Full record

ArticleObesity facts2021

The H2020 "NoHoW Project": A Position Statement on Behavioural Approaches to Longer-Term Weight Management.

R James Stubbs, Cristiana Duarte, Ruairi O'Driscoll, Jake Turicchi, Dominika Kwasnicka, Falko F Sniehotta, Marta M Marques, Graham Horgan, Sofus Larsen, António Palmeira and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity facts, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

R James StubbsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, r.j.stubbs@leeds.ac.uk.
Cristiana DuarteSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Ruairi O'DriscollSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Jake TuricchiSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Dominika KwasnickaFaculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland.
Falko F SniehottaInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Marta M MarquesTrinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation and ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Graham HorganBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland (James Hutton Institute), Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Sofus LarsenResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
António PalmeiraInterdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Inês SantosInterdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro J TeixeiraInterdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jason HalfordSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Berit Lilienthal HeitmannResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
The EASO Obesity Management Task Force
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Lisbon · PTFrederiksberg Hospital · DKBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland · GBNewcastle University · GBTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is substantial evidence documenting the effects of behavioural interventions on weight loss (WL). However, behavioural approaches to initial WL are followed by some degree of longer-term weight regain, and large trials focusing on evidence-based approaches to weight loss maintenance (WLM) have generally only demonstrated small beneficial effects. The current state-of-the-art in behavioural interventions for WL and WLM raises questions of (i) how we define the relationship between WL and WLM, (ii) how energy balance (EB) systems respond to WL and influence behaviours that primarily drive weight regain, (iii) how intervention content, mode of delivery and intensity should be targeted to keep weight off, (iv) which mechanisms of action in complex interventions may prevent weight regain and (v) how to design studies and interventions to maximise effective longer-term weight management. In considering these issues a writing team within the NoHoW Consortium was convened to elaborate a position statement, and behaviour change and obesity experts were invited to discuss these positions and to refine them. At present the evidence suggests that developing the skills to self-manage EB behaviours leads to more effective WLM. However, the effects of behaviour change interventions for WL and WLM are still relatively modest and our understanding of the factors that disrupt and undermine self-management of eating and physical activity is limited. These factors include physiological resistance to weight loss, gradual compensatory changes in eating and physical activity and reactive processes related to stress, emotions, rewards and desires that meet psychological needs. Better matching of evidence-based intervention content to quantitatively tracked EB behaviours and the specific needs of individuals may improve outcomes. Improving objective longitudinal tracking of energy intake and energy expenditure over time would provide a quantitative framework in which to understand the dynamics of behaviour change, mechanisms of action of behaviour change interventions and user engagement with intervention components to potentially improve weight management intervention design and evaluation.

Indexed as

ObesityWeight LossBehavior TherapyEnergy MetabolismExerciseHumansBehaviour changeEnergy balanceWeight lossWeight loss maintenance

Identifiers

PMID33662958
PMCPMC8138206
OpenAlexW3135061072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.