Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33662809›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in plant biology2021

Digital paradigm for Polycomb epigenetic switching and memory.

Govind Menon, Anna Schulten, Caroline Dean, Martin Howard

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Distinct accessory roles ofGenes & development · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Govind MenonDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Anna SchultenDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Caroline DeanDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Martin HowardDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK. Electronic address: martin.howard@jic.ac.uk.
John Innes Centre · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/00000581Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000PR9773Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000PR9788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How epigenetic memory states are established and maintained is a central question in gene regulation. A major epigenetic process important for developmental biology involves Polycomb-mediated chromatin silencing. Significant progress has recently been made on elucidating Polycomb silencing in plant systems through analysis of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC). Quantitative silencing of FLC by prolonged cold exposure was shown to represent an ON to OFF switch in an increasing proportion of cells. Here, we review the underlying all-or-nothing, digital paradigm for Polycomb epigenetic silencing. We then examine other Arabidopsis Polycomb-regulated targets where digital regulation may also be relevant.

Indexed as

Arabidopsis ProteinsMADS Domain ProteinsCold TemperatureEpigenesis, GeneticFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantPolycomb-Group ProteinsArabidopsis ProteinsMADS Domain ProteinsPolycomb-Group Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33662809
PMCPMC8250048
OpenAlexW3134141482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.