ArticleJournal of biomechanics2021
Simulating finger-tip force using two common contact models: Hunt-Crossley and elastic foundation.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive Grid Search Method Using Dynamic Step-Size Adjustment for Robot-Tissue Interaction Force Estimation.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- A Musculoskeletal Model of the Hand and Wrist Capable of Simulating Functional Tasks.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Musculoskeletal models of the hand rarely include fingerpad contact mechanics, thereby limiting our ability to simulate and examine hand-object interactions. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether two common contact models (Hunt-Crossley and Elastic Foundation) can accurately represent the fingerpad. Two musculoskeletal models of the index finger were created by adding fingerpad contact geometry using either the Hunt-Crossley or Elastic Foundation contact models. Key contact parameters (target force, contact area, and stiffness) were then systematically varied through 432 forward dynamic simulations to examine how these parameters influenced estimation of finger-tip forces. Across all simulations, variation in target force, contact area, and stiffness parameters impacted the computation time required to complete the simulations and the accuracy of the predicted finger-tip force. Computation time was over three times longer in simulations with high versus low values of contact area and stiffness in both contact models. For both contact models, larger contact area and stiffness values resulted in simulations that more closely predicted target force. However, across all simulations, the Hunt-Crossley model produced a greater proportion of accurate finger-tip force simulations than the Elastic Foundation model, suggesting that the Hunt-Crossley contact model may be preferable for modeling the fingerpad. Overall, our study demonstrates how the Hunt-Crossley and Elastic Foundation contact models behave in low-force biomechanical scenarios, such as those experienced during hand-object manipulation, and provides a foundation for incorporating contact mechanics into musculoskeletal models of the hand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.