Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33662329›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Public health2021

Social isolation and risk of heart disease and stroke: analysis of two large UK prospective studies.

Robert W Smith, Isobel Barnes, Jane Green, Gillian K Reeves, Valerie Beral, Sarah Floud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert W SmithCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Upstream Lab, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Isobel BarnesCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jane GreenCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gillian K ReevesCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Valerie BeralCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah FloudCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: sarah.floud@ndph.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBSt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/1996001/9454Cancer Research UK 16491Cancer Research UK 29186Medical Research Council G0700474Medical Research Council G9900923Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MR/K02700X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial isolation has been associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease and stroke. However, it is unclear whether the associations differ between fatal and non-fatal events or by the type of isolation (living alone or having few social contacts). We aimed to examine these associations in two large UK prospective cohorts.

methodsMillion Women Study and UK Biobank participants without previous coronary heart disease or stroke who provided data in median year 2010 (IQR 2009-2011) on social contacts were included in this prospective analysis. Participants were followed up to median year 2017 (2017-2017) by electronic linkage to national hospital and death records. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using Cox regression for first coronary heart disease and stroke event (overall, and separately for hospital admission as the first event and for death without an associated hospital admission as the first event) by three levels of social isolation (based on living alone, contact with family or friends, and group participation) adjusted for age, sex, study, region, deprivation, smoking, alcohol intake, body-mass index, physical activity, and self-rated health.

findings938 558 participants were included in our analyses (mean age 63 years [SD 9]): 481 946 participants from the Million Women Study (mean age 68 years [5]) and 456 612 participants (mean age 57 years [8]) from UK Biobank. During a mean follow-up period of 7 years (2), 42 402 first coronary heart disease events (of which 1834 were fatal without an associated hospital admission) and 19 999 first stroke events (of which 529 were fatal without an associated hospital admission) occurred. Little, if any, association was found between social isolation and hospital admission for a first coronary heart disease or stroke event (combined RR for both studies 1·01 [95% CI 0·98-1·04] for coronary heart disease and 1·13 [1·08-1·18] for stroke, when comparing the most isolated group with the least isolated group). However, the risk of death without an associated hospital admission was substantially higher in the most isolated group than the least isolated group for coronary heart disease (1·86 [1·63-2·12]) and stroke (1·91 [1·48-2·46]). For coronary heart disease or stroke death as the first event, RRs were substantially higher (test for heterogeneity, p=0·002) for participants living alone versus those not living alone (1·60 [1·46-1·75]) than for those with fewer versus more contact with family, friends, or groups (1·27 [1·16-1·38]). These findings did not differ greatly between studies, or by self-rated health.

interpretationSocial isolation seems to have little direct effect on the risk of developing a first coronary heart disease or stroke. By contrast, social isolation substantially increases the risk that the first such event is fatal before reaching hospital, particularly among people who live alone, perhaps because of the absence of immediate help in responding to an acute heart attack or stroke.

fundingUK Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK.

Indexed as

Social IsolationAgedFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentStrokeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID33662329
PMCPMC7994247
OpenAlexW3135698413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.