Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33662222›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Influenza and Measles-MMR: two case study of the trend and impact of vaccine-related Twitter posts in Spanish during 2015-2018.

Lucia Prieto Santamaría, Juan Manuel Tuñas, Diego Fernández Peces-Barba, Almudena Jaramillo, Manuel Cotarelo, Ernestina Menasalvas, Antonio Conejo Fernández, Amalia Arce, Angel Gil de Miguel, Alejandro Rodríguez González

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lucia Prieto SantamaríaCentro de Tecnología Biomédica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Juan Manuel TuñasCentro de Tecnología Biomédica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Diego Fernández Peces-BarbaCentro de Tecnología Biomédica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Almudena JaramilloGlobal Medical and Scientific Affairs, MSD España, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel CotareloGlobal Medical and Scientific Affairs, MSD España, Madrid, Spain.
Ernestina MenasalvasCentro de Tecnología Biomédica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5615-6798
Antonio Conejo FernándezDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Vithas Xanit Internacional, Benalmádena,Málaga, Spain.
Amalia ArceHM Nens, Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain.
Angel Gil de MiguelDepartamento de Especialidades Médicas y Salud Pública, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Alejandro Rodríguez GonzálezCentro de Tecnología Biomédica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8801-4762
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid · ESMSD (Spain) · ESHospital de Nens de Barcelona · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media, and in particularly Twitter, can be a resource of enormous value to retrieve information about the opinion of general populaton to vaccines. The increasing popularity of this social media has allowed to use its content to have a clear picture of their users on this topic. In this paper, we perform a study about vaccine-related messages published in Spanish during 2015-2018. More specifically, the paper has focused on two specific diseases: influenza and measles (and MMR as its vaccine). By also including an analysis about the sentiment expressed on the published tweets, we have been able to identify the type of messages that are published on Twitter with respect these two pathologies and their vaccines. Results showed that in contrary on popular opinions, most of the messages published are non-negative. On the other hand, the analysis showed that some messages attracted a huge attention and provoked peaks in the number of published tweets, explaining some changes in the observed trends.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMeaslesSocial MediaHumansInfluenza VaccinesInfluenzameaslesMMRsentiment analysisSpanishTwitter

Identifiers

PMID33662222
PMCPMC9128558
OpenAlexW3135841297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.