Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33662133›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Estimated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization in Intensive Care Units Associated With Single-Application Chlorhexidine Gluconate or Mupirocin.

Eric T Lofgren, Matthew Mietchen, Kristen V Dicks, Rebekah Moehring, Deverick Anderson, Centers for Disease Control Modeling Infectious Diseases in Healthcare Program

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Moana: Alternate surveillance for COVID-19 in a Unique Population (MASC-UP).Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric T LofgrenPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
Matthew MietchenPaul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
Kristen V DicksDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina.
Rebekah MoehringDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina.
Deverick AndersonDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina.
Centers for Disease Control Modeling Infectious Diseases in Healthcare Program
Duke University · USWashington State University · US

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and mupirocin are widely used to decolonize patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and reduce risks associated with infection in hospitalized populations. Quantifying the association of an application of CHG alone or in combination with mupirocin with risk of MRSA infection is important for studies evaluating alternative decolonization strategies or schedules and for identifying whether there is room for improved decolonizing agents. Objective: To estimate the proportion of patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG and mupirocin from existing population-level studies. Design, Setting, and Participants: A stochastic mathematical model of an 18-bed intensive care unit (ICU) in an academic medical center operating over 1 year was used to estimate parameters for the proportion of simulated patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG and mupirocin. The model was conducted using approximate bayesian computation with data from an existing meta-analysis of studies conducted from February 2005 through January 2015. Data were analyzed from January 2018 through November 2019. Exposure: A universal decolonization protocol for colonized patients in the ICU using CHG or CHG and mupirocin in combination was simulated. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG and mupirocin was estimated. Results: The estimated proportion of patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG was 0.15 (95% credible interval, 0.01-0.42), and the estimated proportion per application of mupirocin in conjunction with CHG was 0.15 (95% credible interval, 0.01-0.54). A lag in colonization detection was associated with decreases in the CHG estimate (0.11; 95% credible interval, 0.01-0.30) and mupirocin estimate (0.10; 95% credible interval, 0.00-0.34), which were sensitive to the value of the modeled contact rate between nurses and patients. A 1% increase in the value of this parameter was associated with a 0.73% increase in the estimated combined outcomes associated with CHG and mupirocin (95% CI: 0.71, 0.75). Gaps longer than 24 hours in the administration of decolonizing agents were associated with a decrease of within-ICU MRSA transmission. Compared with a mean (SD) of 1.23 (0.27) acquisitions per 1000 patient-days in scenarios with no decolonizing bathing, a bathing protocol administering CHG and mupirocin every 120 hours was associated with a mean (SD) acquisition rate of 1.03 (0.24) acquisitions per 1000 patient days, a 16.3% decrease (95% CI, 14.7%-18.0%; P > .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that there may be room for significant improvement in anti-MRSA disinfectants, including the compounds themselves and their delivery mechanisms. Despite the decolonization estimates found in this study, these agents are associated with robust outcomes after delays in administration, which may help in alleviating concerns over patient comfort and toxic effects.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineCross InfectionHumansIntensive Care UnitsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMupirocinStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconateMupirocin

Identifiers

PMID33662133
PMCPMC7933999
OpenAlexW3135089784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.